Edward Rudd | 13 Nov 2007 02:14
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: Using worker mpm with mod_log_sql

Yes, current released versions of mod_log_sql do not support threaded  
MPMs.

And when I get to writing the DBD plugin for mod_log_sql it will only  
be supported under apache 2.2..

It should be possible to backporting DBD into Apache 2.0.  Which  
actually would be easier that writing a whole DB pooling system from  
scratch for mod_log_sql.  (as all the work is done for apache 2.2)

On Nov 12, 2007, at 4:44 AM, Paul Bridger wrote:

> Hi
>
> I used mod_log_sql in my previous job, and found it to be excellent.
> However, I've recently started working for a company that uses the
> threaded worker MPM version of apache 2.0, and now I find that it
> doesn't seem to work with this version, with a large number of aborted
> DB connections, seg faults and glibc detected corrupted double-linked
> errors.
>
> I found a post to the list dated 17th Dec 2006 on this same topic,  
> which
> indicated that support for worker MPM  would be added at some stage by
> switching the DB layer to apr_dbd which supports connection pooling  
> and
> full threading for use under apache 2.2.
>
> Has this functionality been added?  If so, is there a way to get it
> working with threaded apache 2.0, or does it require 2.2?
(Continue reading)

Paul Bridger | 13 Nov 2007 08:38
Picon

Re: Using worker mpm with mod_log_sql

Edward Rudd wrote:
Hi Edward

Many thanks for the information.  It's great to hear that worker MPM 
will be supported in the 2.2 version.  If the code can be backported to 
2.0, then that would be a huge bonus, too.

If at any stage you need help with beta code testing for 2.2?  I'd be 
more than happy to help out.  I have access to Centos/Redhat 4/5, Suse 
9/10 and FreeBSD 6.2 machines.

Many thanks.

Regards, Paul

Once again

> Yes, current released versions of mod_log_sql do not support threaded  
> MPMs.
>
> And when I get to writing the DBD plugin for mod_log_sql it will only  
> be supported under apache 2.2..
>
> It should be possible to backporting DBD into Apache 2.0.  Which  
> actually would be easier that writing a whole DB pooling system from  
> scratch for mod_log_sql.  (as all the work is done for apache 2.2)
>
> On Nov 12, 2007, at 4:44 AM, Paul Bridger wrote:
>
>   
(Continue reading)


Gmane