headers
Michael Baessler | 1 Aug 17:07
Picon

Re: Source in the binary release

Michael Baessler wrote:
> Marshall Schor wrote:
>> Adam Lally wrote:
>>> On 7/31/07, Marshall Schor <msa@...> wrote:
>>>  
>>>> Also - the resources need to be included in the jars (they have the
>>>> message bundles, etc.).
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>
>>> The resource are already in the jars, so we don't need to add them in
>>> this step.  Just the source files need to be added.
>>>   
>> oops - I didn't look closely at the -u flag.  I thought you were 
>> re-building & replacing the jars.
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>>
>>
> I did some tests on linux and after adding
> #!/bin/sh
> to the first line, all seems to be fine.
>
> -- Michael
>
>
I see that issue 499 is still in reopen state. I checked in my changes 
using this issue. So I think we can close them or is there anything else 
we need to do?
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Adam Lally | 1 Aug 20:05
Picon

Re: Source in the binary release

On 8/1/07, Michael Baessler <mba@...> wrote:
> I see that issue 499 is still in reopen state. I checked in my changes
> using this issue. So I think we can close them or is there anything else
> we need to do?

OK with me to close it.

-Adam
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Marshall Schor | 2 Aug 05:34

Re: Source in the binary release

Adam Lally wrote:
> On 8/1/07, Michael Baessler <mba@...> wrote:
>   
>> I see that issue 499 is still in reopen state. I checked in my changes
>> using this issue. So I think we can close them or is there anything else
>> we need to do?
>>     
>
> OK with me to close it.
>   
We should update the documentation (3 places?) which describes how to 
attach javadocs, to now also mention
running those scripts to attach the source. 

-Marshall
> -Adam
>
>
>
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Michael Baessler | 2 Aug 20:01
Picon

Re: Source in the binary release

Marshall Schor wrote:
> We should update the documentation (3 places?) which describes how to 
> attach javadocs, to now also mention
> running those scripts to attach the source.
Do you know where exactly the places are that we need to change? I would 
like to finish this as soon as possible so that we get the release out 
of the door.

-- Michael
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Thilo Goetz | 2 Aug 22:22
Picon
Picon

Re: Source in the binary release

Michael Baessler wrote:
> Marshall Schor wrote:
>> We should update the documentation (3 places?) which describes how to
>> attach javadocs, to now also mention
>> running those scripts to attach the source.
> Do you know where exactly the places are that we need to change? I would
> like to finish this as soon as possible so that we get the release out
> of the door.
> 
> -- Michael

I have added a short paragraph to the Eclipse setup section.  If more
documentation is needed elsewhere, feel free to add it.  I'd like to
build a release candidate tomorrow morning and start the vote on it,
if that's ok with everybody (which means I would like to close UIMA-499).

--Thilo
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Marshall Schor | 3 Aug 04:52

Re: Source in the binary release

Thilo Goetz wrote:
> Michael Baessler wrote:
>   
>> Marshall Schor wrote:
>>     
>>> We should update the documentation (3 places?) which describes how to
>>> attach javadocs, to now also mention
>>> running those scripts to attach the source.
>>>       
>> Do you know where exactly the places are that we need to change? I would
>> like to finish this as soon as possible so that we get the release out
>> of the door.
>>
>> -- Michael
>>     
>
> I have added a short paragraph to the Eclipse setup section.  If more
> documentation is needed elsewhere, feel free to add it.  I'd like to
> build a release candidate tomorrow morning and start the vote on it,
> if that's ok with everybody (which means I would like to close UIMA-499).
>   
I updated the ref javadoc chapter also.  I think that's all that's 
needed.  +1 to closing 499 now.
-Marshall
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Michael Baessler | 3 Aug 11:54
Picon

Re: Source in the binary release

Marshall Schor wrote:
> Thilo Goetz wrote:
>> Michael Baessler wrote:
>>  
>>> Marshall Schor wrote:
>>>    
>>>> We should update the documentation (3 places?) which describes how to
>>>> attach javadocs, to now also mention
>>>> running those scripts to attach the source.
>>>>       
>>> Do you know where exactly the places are that we need to change? I 
>>> would
>>> like to finish this as soon as possible so that we get the release out
>>> of the door.
>>>
>>> -- Michael
>>>     
>>
>> I have added a short paragraph to the Eclipse setup section.  If more
>> documentation is needed elsewhere, feel free to add it.  I'd like to
>> build a release candidate tomorrow morning and start the vote on it,
>> if that's ok with everybody (which means I would like to close 
>> UIMA-499).
>>   
> I updated the ref javadoc chapter also.  I think that's all that's 
> needed.  +1 to closing 499 now.
Thanks!

-- Michael
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Adam Lally | 2 Aug 15:11
Picon

Re: Source in the binary release

> We should update the documentation (3 places?) which describes how to
> attach javadocs, to now also mention
> running those scripts to attach the source.
>

I updated the README file for the source distribution.  Not sure where
else we have documentation relating to the source dist - on the
website?

-Adam
Permalink | Reply |

Gmane