Re: comments on compiling JACK (especially for packagers)

On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 07:44 +0100, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 15:47 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 15:43 +0100, Paul Davis wrote:
> > > I have seen several different packages of JACK and/or their build
> > > scripts that are either incorrect, or less than optimal. Users do this
> > > too. I think we need to review the options:
> > > 
> > > DETAILS
> > > 
> > > Configure options first, then comments after the option(s).
> > > 
> > > Packages (and users) should probably never ever use these.
> > > 
> > >   --enable-dynsimd        enable dynamic SIMD selection (default=no)
> > > 
> > > This is a very complex option, and is best left off unless you really
> > > know what you are doing. In particular, do not use this with
> > > --enable-optimize.
> > 
> > Hmmm, I was using it... so what is the interaction with enable-optimize,
> > which I should use (together with optimization-by-compiler)?
> 
> I've fixed all that up now. It now works with --enable-optimize. In
> addition, --enable-optimization-by-compiler will not add any
> processor-specific compile flags, which it was still doing before.
> 
> fernando, i'm about to release 0.116.0, which properly supports 32/64
> mixed server/client setups, compiles on OS X, has fixes/improvements for
> netjack, and has configure improvements. you might want to hold on off
> on packaging 0.115.6.