4 Aug 2012 10:30
4 Aug 2012 13:43
4 Aug 2012 16:30
Re: Stance on TPM?
Fred . <eldmannen <at> gmail.com>
2012-08-04 14:30:07 GMT
2012-08-04 14:30:07 GMT
So such patches would be accepted? If so, then maybe put TPM on the TODO list. On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Peter Stuge <peter <at> stuge.se> wrote: > Fred . wrote: >> What is SeaBIOS stance on Trusted Platform Module (TPM) ? > > I guess that there is no stance until you or someone else sends > patches that we can discuss. > > > //Peter > > _______________________________________________ > SeaBIOS mailing list > SeaBIOS <at> seabios.org > http://www.seabios.org/mailman/listinfo/seabios
10 Sep 2012 22:42
Re: Stance on TPM?
Stefan Berger <stefanb <at> linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2012-09-10 20:42:19 GMT
2012-09-10 20:42:19 GMT
On 08/04/2012 07:43 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Fred . wrote:
>> What is SeaBIOS stance on Trusted Platform Module (TPM) ?
> I guess that there is no stance until you or someone else sends
> patches that we can discuss.
Sorry for the late response: TPM support patches have been posted a long
time ago but due to lack of support for TPM in QEMU and not finding
someone to test them on coreboot+SeaBIOS supported hardware, they did
not so far make it into SeaBIOS git.
Stefan
RSS Feed