17 Jul 05:00
GFS to replace NFS... will this work?
Rick Franchuk <rickf <at> transpect.net>
2002-07-17 03:00:53 GMT
2002-07-17 03:00:53 GMT
Hey there, I currently have an elaborate NFS serving setup, and would like something faster and easier to manage without requiring the wholesale replacement of some fairly expensive hardware. Right now I have 4 600GB fileservers (ext3 on raid5 on mylex dac950 controllers) which push data over gigE to a couple dozen front end boxes via NFS. The servers are mirrored in pairs (serv1a has the same data as serv2a, serv1b has the same data as serv2b), and one of the pairs is mounted on a given front end box. Initially we had 2 fileservers (for NFS performance and redundancy) but the dataset has outgrown the original 600gb and required an additional pair of servers. I'm looking ahead to a time when this next 600gb will be consumed and our bandwidth requirements grow yet again. It would be nice to not need to to grow into a 3 x 3 configuration, considering these servers, at the very cheapest, would run us between $10-15k USD, not to mention the organizational headaches it causes me. What I'm particularly looking for is a system which would satisfy these requirements, and ease my storage-related concerns for the forseeable future: - Make use of current hardware with as few additional hardware requirements as possible. - Be as stable as the current setup. While the current schema is a little complex, I've been able to get it to (or near) 5 nines availability. It would be VERY BAD if a replacement system didn't match that availability.(Continue reading)
RSS Feed