2 Sep 03:15
Time to truncate
Daniel Phillips <phillips <at> phunq.net>
2008-09-02 01:15:49 GMT
2008-09-02 01:15:49 GMT
The last burst of checkins has brought Tux3 to the pointer where it undeniably acts like a filesystem: one can write files, go away, come back later and read those files by name. We can see some of the hoped for attractiveness starting to emerge: Tux3 clearly does scale from the very small to the very big at the same time. We have our Exabyte file with 4K blocksize and we can also create 64 Petabyte files using 256 byte blocks. How cool is that? Not much chance for internal fragmentation with 256 byte blocks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fragmentation_(computer) I wonder how well Tux3 will perform with 256 byte blocks. Actually, I don't really see big problems. We should probably be working mostly with tiny blocks in initial development, because little blocks generate bushy trees, and bushy trees expose boundary conditions much faster than big blocks. Which is exactly what we need now if we want to get stable early. Plus it helps focus on allocation strategy: more little blocks means more chances for things to go wrong by fragmentation. Let's keep that issue front and center throughout the entire course of Tux3 development. (When we get closer to the kernel port I will switch to working mainly with 512 byte blocks, which is the finest granularity supported by Linux block devices at present.) Anyway, the question naturally arises: what next? There are so many issues remaining, big and small. Some of the big ones: * Atomic Commit - we want to know if Tux3's new forward logging strategy is as good as I have boasted, and indeed, does it work(Continue reading)
RSS Feed