headers
Chris Travers | 29 Jul 2012 10:57
Picon

Where to put the PHP interop classes

Hi all;

I am trying to decide where to put the PHP interop classes.  It seems
we have a few possibilities:

1)  In /addons/ maybe a new directory like /addons/languages/
2)  In a separate open source project like ledgersmb-php on
Sourceforge or Google Code

I am leaning towards the latter because we could do additional
releases on Freecode and hopefully get more interest that way.
However, I would like to get feedback from others first.  Maybe I am
missing something.  Maybe the other way is better, etc.  So let me
know what you think and have your say.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
Permalink | Reply |
headers
John Locke | 29 Jul 2012 17:02
Favicon

Re: Where to put the PHP interop classes

[Replying to more appropriate thread...]

What about Github?

Not just for the PHP classes -- the whole project?

SF is annoying, by comparison...

Cheers,
John Locke
http://www.freelock.com

On 07/29/2012 01:57 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> I am trying to decide where to put the PHP interop classes.  It seems
> we have a few possibilities:
>
> 1)  In /addons/ maybe a new directory like /addons/languages/
> 2)  In a separate open source project like ledgersmb-php on
> Sourceforge or Google Code
>
> I am leaning towards the latter because we could do additional
> releases on Freecode and hopefully get more interest that way.
> However, I would like to get feedback from others first.  Maybe I am
> missing something.  Maybe the other way is better, etc.  So let me
> know what you think and have your say.
>
> Best Wishes,
> Chris Travers
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Chris Travers | 30 Jul 2012 02:16
Picon

Re: Where to put the PHP interop classes

On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 8:02 AM, John Locke <mail@...> wrote:
> [Replying to more appropriate thread...]
>
> What about Github?
>
> Not just for the PHP classes -- the whole project?

At least for the PHP classes, I think the more sites we are using for
some of these side-projects the more exposure we get.  Moving a
project at this stage is a lot of work and would probably have to be
phased.  Realistically I don't see it happening short-term.  It might
be worth thinking about/discussing once we are in beta and feature
requests are relatively stable.  I haven't really formed an opinion of
that longer-term but we'd want to keep in mind that effort migrating
would likely cause a temporary loss of momentum.  The question is
really whether we'd pick up enough additional momentum for that to be
worth it.

Best Wishes,
Chris Trabvers

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Robert James Clay | 31 Jul 2012 03:08
Picon

Re: Where to put the PHP interop classes

On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 11:02 -0400, John Locke wrote:
> [Replying to more appropriate thread...]
> 
> What about Github?
> 
> Not just for the PHP classes -- the whole project?

   Why?

> SF is annoying, by comparison...

   <shrug> I don't find it so (I've had a SourceForge account much
longer but I've also had a GitHUB account for a while); although it's
also true that for those SF projects I'm an admin on, I'm changing (or
have changed) them over to the new SF project framework ("Allura").
(Which includes sub-projects, btw...) 

Jame

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Chris Travers | 31 Jul 2012 03:24
Picon

Re: Where to put the PHP interop classes

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Robert James Clay <jame@...> wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 11:02 -0400, John Locke wrote:
>> [Replying to more appropriate thread...]
>>
>> What about Github?
>>
>> Not just for the PHP classes -- the whole project?
>
>    Why?
>
>> SF is annoying, by comparison...
>
>    <shrug> I don't find it so (I've had a SourceForge account much
> longer but I've also had a GitHUB account for a while); although it's
> also true that for those SF projects I'm an admin on, I'm changing (or
> have changed) them over to the new SF project framework ("Allura").
> (Which includes sub-projects, btw...)

What are the advantages of the new framework?

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Robert James Clay | 5 Aug 2012 11:18
Picon

Re: Where to put the PHP interop classes

On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 21:24 -0400, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Robert James Clay <jame@...> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 11:02 -0400, John Locke wrote:
> >> SF is annoying, by comparison...
> >
> >    <shrug> I don't find it so (I've had a SourceForge account much
> > longer but I've also had a GitHUB account for a while); although it's
> > also true that for those SF projects I'm an admin on, I'm changing (or
> > have changed) them over to the new SF project framework ("Allura").
> > (Which includes sub-projects, btw...)
> 
> What are the advantages of the new framework?

   Integration is one major thing.  Things like a "Wiki, Tracker, SCM
(svn, git and hg), Discussion, and Blog tools" are all part of the same
framework now.  And the sub-projects that can now be created can each
have their own set of the same things;  that's what drew me into
investigating the new framework.  Things like the project catagorization
has been redone, and sub-projects can be done separately.

Jame

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
Permalink | Reply |

Gmane