headers
Harpal Grover | 6 Feb 19:41
Picon

Is GCJ still active?

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Andrew Haley <aph <at> redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 02/05/2012 06:33 PM, 孙波翔 wrote:
>
> > I am doing a project(open source) and need to complie some java
> > *.class files to *.dll and *.so files so that this files can run
> > without jre.
> >
> > I found there only have to tools can do it: Jet and GCJ.
> >
> > Jet is not under GPL license. And the latest release of GCJ was on Sep
> > 22, 2009. I need to compile the java files and support JDK 1.7
> > features. So does GCJ still active and may support JDK 1.7 in future?
>
> gcj ahas been released several times since then.  There is a little
> development still going on, but at present there are no plans to do
> a release that supports Java 1.7 features.
>
> Andrew.

So naturally, the next question then would be:

Will there be any capabilities to compile java applications to native
binaries using the OpenJDK? If not, who should we contact to convey
the ever so popular and growing interest in being able to do this for
Linux, OS X and Windows?
--
Harpal Grover
President
Harpal Grover Consulting Inc
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Andrew Haley | 6 Feb 19:48
Picon
Favicon

Re: Is GCJ still active?

On 02/06/2012 06:41 PM, Harpal Grover wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Andrew Haley <aph <at> redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 02/05/2012 06:33 PM, 孙波翔 wrote:
>>
>>> I am doing a project(open source) and need to complie some java
>>> *.class files to *.dll and *.so files so that this files can run
>>> without jre.
>>>
>>> I found there only have to tools can do it: Jet and GCJ.
>>>
>>> Jet is not under GPL license. And the latest release of GCJ was on Sep
>>> 22, 2009. I need to compile the java files and support JDK 1.7
>>> features. So does GCJ still active and may support JDK 1.7 in future?
>>
>> gcj ahas been released several times since then.  There is a little
>> development still going on, but at present there are no plans to do
>> a release that supports Java 1.7 features.
> 
> 
> So naturally, the next question then would be:
> 
> Will there be any capabilities to compile java applications to native
> binaries using the OpenJDK?

Never say never, but I am not aware of any such thing.

> If not, who should we contact to convey the ever so popular and
> growing interest in being able to do this for Linux, OS X and
> Windows?
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Joel Dice | 6 Feb 19:56
Picon

Re: Is GCJ still active?

On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Harpal Grover wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Andrew Haley <aph <at> redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 02/05/2012 06:33 PM, 孙波翔 wrote:
>>
>>> I am doing a project(open source) and need to complie some java
>>> *.class files to *.dll and *.so files so that this files can run
>>> without jre.
>>>
>>> I found there only have to tools can do it: Jet and GCJ.
>>>
>>> Jet is not under GPL license. And the latest release of GCJ was on Sep
>>> 22, 2009. I need to compile the java files and support JDK 1.7
>>> features. So does GCJ still active and may support JDK 1.7 in future?
>>
>> gcj ahas been released several times since then.  There is a little
>> development still going on, but at present there are no plans to do
>> a release that supports Java 1.7 features.
>>
>> Andrew.
>
>
> So naturally, the next question then would be:
>
> Will there be any capabilities to compile java applications to native
> binaries using the OpenJDK? If not, who should we contact to convey
> the ever so popular and growing interest in being able to do this for
> Linux, OS X and Windows?
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
lucianomanzo | 7 Feb 21:39
Picon

Re: Is GCJ still active?

Hi Joel,

Congratulations for this excellent project!!

If I understend, it's possible to compile java code to binary code?

A SWT application runs with avian?

Thank you

On 06-02-2012 16:56, Joel Dice wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Harpal Grover wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Andrew Haley <aph <at> redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/05/2012 06:33 PM, 孙波翔 wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am doing a project(open source) and need to complie some java
>>>> *.class files to *.dll and *.so files so that this files can run
>>>> without jre.
>>>>
>>>> I found there only have to tools can do it: Jet and GCJ.
>>>>
>>>> Jet is not under GPL license. And the latest release of GCJ was on Sep
>>>> 22, 2009. I need to compile the java files and support JDK 1.7
>>>> features. So does GCJ still active and may support JDK 1.7 in future?
>>>
>>> gcj ahas been released several times since then.  There is a little
>>> development still going on, but at present there are no plans to do
>>> a release that supports Java 1.7 features.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Joel Dice | 7 Feb 21:57
Picon

Re: Is GCJ still active?

On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, lucianomanzo wrote:

> Hi Joel,
>
> Congratulations for this excellent project!!
>
> If I understend, it's possible to compile java code to binary code?

Yes, Avian supports either JIT (just-in-time) or AOT (ahead-of-time) 
compilation to machine code, or a mix of both.

> A SWT application runs with avian?

Yes.

Please direct any further questions or comments about Avian to 
avian <at> googlegroups.com, since they're off-topic for this list.  Thanks.

>
> Thank you
>
> On 06-02-2012 16:56, Joel Dice wrote:
>>  On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Harpal Grover wrote:
>> 
>> >  On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Andrew Haley <aph <at> redhat.com> wrote:
>> > > 
>> > >  On 02/05/2012 06:33 PM, 孙波翔 wrote:
>> > > 
>> > > >  I am doing a project(open source) and need to complie some java
>> > > >  *.class files to *.dll and *.so files so that this files can run
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |

Gmane