Re: [PATCH] Makefile.in includes linux-record.c to be common for all arch. (arm-reversible>phase-3)

Hi Hui,

The phase2 works indepedently. It does not need syscall really. If i
recall correctly michael snyder suggested that i make two patches. The
first patch contains arm instructions and the second part contains
linux abi support.

The second part which i am working now requires linux-record.o hence i
wrote we require it to be compiled with the second part of patch.

So first i try to chek in minor change of configure.tgt and then i
check syscall record on arm; It has no dependency on any previous
arm-record stuffs.

By the way there is one more query which has been there under discussion.
When you made gdb sys call defination, it was thought as generic, but
it does not turn out to be applicable for arm as syscall number
differs. Sometime back tom had suggestion of having xml files under
gdb/syscalls  for arm arch and x86 separately; do you have any inputs
to it?  Of course it would change x86 syscall record to be read from
xml files.

Regards,
Oza.

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:19 AM, oza Pawandeep <oza.pawandeep <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Hui,
>
> The phase2 works indepedently. It does not need syscall really. If i recall
> correctly michael snyder suggested that i make two patches.  The first patch