Charles Karney | 16 Jul 2012 16:36

Re: Algorithms for geodesics

On 2012-07-16 10:15, Alexander Holsteinson wrote:
> Did the guys from Google Earth ever address the problems you indicated
> to them regarding their model?
>

No, I couldn't get any traction on my concerns.  Undoubtedly, they see
their customers as ordinary consumers who are chiefly interested in a
responsive GUI and pretty pictures and who are less interested in the
precision of the data.

   --Charles
_______________________________________________
Proj mailing list
Proj <at> lists.maptools.org
http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/proj

Gerald I. Evenden | 16 Jul 2012 19:47
Picon

Re: Algorithms for geodesics

On 07/16/2012 10:36 AM, Charles Karney wrote:
> On 2012-07-16 10:15, Alexander Holsteinson wrote:
>> Did the guys from Google Earth ever address the problems you indicated
>> to them regarding their model?
>>
> No, I couldn't get any traction on my concerns.  Undoubtedly, they see
> their customers as ordinary consumers who are chiefly interested in a
> responsive GUI and pretty pictures and who are less interested in the
> precision of the data.
>
>     --Charles
> _______________________________________________
> Proj mailing list
> Proj <at> lists.maptools.org
> http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
What a surprise.

Seriously, I would be surprised if there was any other response. Google
is not a Nat'l Geog. Society clone likely to spend hours on the technical
minutia of cartography.

-- "Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as 
false, and by rulers as useful." Seneca
_______________________________________________
Proj mailing list
Proj <at> lists.maptools.org
http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/proj

Charles Karney | 16 Jul 2012 21:03

Re: Algorithms for geodesics

On 2012-07-16 13:47, Gerald I. Evenden wrote:
> On 07/16/2012 10:36 AM, Charles Karney wrote:
>> >On 2012-07-16 10:15, Alexander Holsteinson wrote:
>>> >>Did the guys from Google Earth ever address the problems you indicated
>>> >>to them regarding their model?
>>> >>
>> >No, I couldn't get any traction on my concerns.  Undoubtedly, they see
>> >their customers as ordinary consumers who are chiefly interested in a
>> >responsive GUI and pretty pictures and who are less interested in the
>> >precision of the data.
>> >
>> >     --Charles
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Proj mailing list
>> >Proj <at> lists.maptools.org
>> >http://lists.maptools.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
> What a surprise.
>
> Seriously, I would be surprised if there was any other response. Google
> is not a Nat'l Geog. Society clone likely to spend hours on the technical
> minutia of cartography.

Not all of the issues are minutia...

(1) You might expect that a user should be able to draw a polygon that
encircles the north pole.  However you can't do this with Google Earth.
(Google isn't "wrapping" longitudes reasonably in this instance.)

(2) You might expect that if the documentation says that the edges of a
polygon have constant bearing that this property should hold.  It
(Continue reading)


Gmane