Re: Message style (Was:Why several versions of the same utility?)

> Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 10:29:49 +0530
> From: Dipanjan Das <its.dipanjan.das@...>
> Subject: Re: [Mingw-users] Why several versions of the same utility?
> To: MinGW Users List <mingw-users@...>
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAEK-7JKhBHa2P_Q4QdEOx=m+2jmXM=Om4gnAsAV+WA5dz3XPvA@...>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>

> PS:
> Please do not top post and please reply the context properly, your
> current messages take huge efforts to read and understand
>
> Actually I couldn't get the meaning of the instruction. It appeared in some
> earlier mail also. For the ease of reading, I am quoting the context and
> coloring it in blue. Still, how is it incomprehensible? What else should I
> do? Please be clearer.
>

Blue! Oh how amusing, oh how NAIVE. Blue text only works if HTML mail
is accepted, but I for one don't receive HTML emails. Instead, I use
plain-text, and in those 'blue' is nothing more than a word. Here is
how the text that I quoted above should have appeared:

>> PS:
>> Please do not top post and please reply the context properly, your
>> current messages take huge efforts to read and understand
>
> Actually I couldn't get the meaning of the instruction. It appeared in some
> earlier mail also. For the ease of reading, I am quoting the context and