3 Mar 2011 20:58
3 Mar 2011 21:27
Re: On shoebot-dq
ricardo lafuente <r <at> sollec.org>
2011-03-03 20:27:26 GMT
2011-03-03 20:27:26 GMT
If there's no apparent blocker, let's do it. I keep falling short of finishing the .3 release, and I suppose the wait hasn't made things any better. If funny stuff pops up with the new version, we can just fix things there. So let's bring out 0.4! On 03/03/2011 07:58 PM, Sebastian Oliva wrote: > I saw the new changes on shoebot-dq branch, and then seem to work as a > charm. I think most of the major issues are fixed, and we could start > using shoebot-dq as the default shoebot; or am I missing something? > _______________________________________________ > Shoebot-devel mailing list > Shoebot-devel@... > http://lists.tinkerhouse.net/listinfo.cgi/shoebot-devel-tinkerhouse.net >
3 Mar 2011 21:54
Re: On shoebot-dq
architetto francesco fantoni <hva - hermanitos verdes architetti> <francesco@...>
2011-03-03 20:54:10 GMT
2011-03-03 20:54:10 GMT
It's working great, though I still have some problems in running some examples. for example the Image object has no more a draw attribute, and last time I checked I had some issue with clipping, but I will test more carefully. a very good job indeed anyway! francesco Il giorno gio, 03/03/2011 alle 20.27 +0000, ricardo lafuente ha scritto: > If there's no apparent blocker, let's do it. I keep falling short of > finishing the .3 release, and I suppose the wait hasn't made things any > better. > > If funny stuff pops up with the new version, we can just fix things > there. So let's bring out 0.4! > > On 03/03/2011 07:58 PM, Sebastian Oliva wrote: > > I saw the new changes on shoebot-dq branch, and then seem to work as a > > charm. I think most of the major issues are fixed, and we could start > > using shoebot-dq as the default shoebot; or am I missing something? > > _______________________________________________ > > Shoebot-devel mailing list > > Shoebot-devel@... > > http://lists.tinkerhouse.net/listinfo.cgi/shoebot-devel-tinkerhouse.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > Shoebot-devel mailing list > Shoebot-devel@... > http://lists.tinkerhouse.net/listinfo.cgi/shoebot-devel-tinkerhouse.net(Continue reading)
7 Mar 2011 10:30
Re: On shoebot-dq
S++ ----- Original Message ---- > From: "architetto francesco fantoni <hva - hermanitos verdes architetti>" ><francesco@...> > To: shoebot-devel@... > Sent: Thu, March 3, 2011 8:54:10 PM > Subject: Re: [shoebot-devel] On shoebot-dq > > It's working great, though I still have some problems in running some > examples. > for example the Image object has no more a draw attribute, and last time > I checked I had some issue with clipping, but I will test more > carefully. > a very good job indeed anyway! > francesco > > > Il giorno gio, 03/03/2011 alle 20.27 +0000, ricardo lafuente ha scritto: > > If there's no apparent blocker, let's do it. I keep falling short of > > finishing the .3 release, and I suppose the wait hasn't made things any > > better. > > > > If funny stuff pops up with the new version, we can just fix things > > there. So let's bring out 0.4! > > > > On 03/03/2011 07:58 PM, Sebastian Oliva wrote: > > > I saw the new changes on shoebot-dq branch, and then seem to work as a > > > charm. I think most of the major issues are fixed, and we could start(Continue reading)
7 Mar 2011 12:49
Re: On shoebot-dq
Oops - didn't mean to send a blank email > > From: "architetto francesco fantoni <hva - hermanitos verdes architetti>" > ><francesco@...> > > To: shoebot-devel@... > > Sent: Thu, March 3, 2011 8:54:10 PM > > Subject: Re: [shoebot-devel] On shoebot-dq > > > > It's working great, though I still have some problems in running some > > examples. > > for example the Image object has no more a draw attribute, and last time This shouldn't be too much hassle to add back. there are some other things not working in images, as I was experimenting with a gdk based image as opposed to PIL (to see if it would be faster, to avoid pixel format conversions between cairo and PIL). I should probably either add the missing features (it doesn't support passing the raw image data in currently) or revert it to PIL. > > I checked I had some issue with clipping, but I will test more > > carefully. Clipping is the main thing that is missing from -dq ... I don't *think* it should be hard to implement, have to have a go I guess. > > a very good job indeed anyway! > > francesco > > > > > > Il giorno gio, 03/03/2011 alle 20.27 +0000, ricardo lafuente ha scritto: > > > If there's no apparent blocker, let's do it. I keep falling short of(Continue reading)
15 Mar 2011 00:40
Re: On shoebot-dq
ricardo lafuente <r <at> sollec.org>
2011-03-14 23:40:20 GMT
2011-03-14 23:40:20 GMT
> Cool .. should we try and fix the two issues I mentioned (clipping and missing > image support first) ? > Or just get this one out and do those in 0.5 ? Image support is pretty important to have, but I'd rather push this in and then fix it for a 0.4.1. How does that sound? Sebastian also managed to convert the repository to Git -- http://gitorious.org/shoebot/shoebot-dq -- thus providing a good solution to our previous discussion about moving our repository and opting for a VCS. I've been working with Git lately and it's a pretty easy transition from Mercurial -- I could write a quick HOWTO if needed. Also -- I've been noticing that the colors library is spectacularly huge (tons of XML files), causing installation slowness and some other nasties. What do you think of taking it out and providing it separately? (it would also make the repo a lot lighter, space-wise) Cheers and thanks everyone for the awesome work! >>>> On 03/03/2011 07:58 PM, Sebastian Oliva wrote: >>>>> I saw the new changes on shoebot-dq branch, and then seem to work as a >>>>> charm. I think most of the major issues are fixed, and we could start >>>>> using shoebot-dq as the default shoebot; or am I missing something? >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Shoebot-devel mailing list >>>>> Shoebot-devel@... >>> > > >> http://lists.tinkerhouse.net/listinfo.cgi/shoebot-devel-tinkerhouse.net >>> > >(Continue reading)
15 Mar 2011 15:33
Re: On shoebot-dq
> From: ricardo lafuente <r <at> sollec.org> > To: shoebot-devel@... > Sent: Mon, March 14, 2011 11:40:20 PM > Subject: Re: [shoebot-devel] On shoebot-dq > > > Cool .. should we try and fix the two issues I mentioned (clipping and >missing > > image support first) ? > > Or just get this one out and do those in 0.5 ? > > Image support is pretty important to have, but I'd rather push this in > and then fix it for a 0.4.1. How does that sound? > > Sebastian also managed to convert the repository to Git -- > http://gitorious.org/shoebot/shoebot-dq -- thus providing a good > solution to our previous discussion about moving our repository and > opting for a VCS. I've been working with Git lately and it's a pretty > easy transition from Mercurial -- I could write a quick HOWTO if needed. > > Also -- I've been noticing that the colors library is spectacularly huge > (tons of XML files), causing installation slowness and some other > nasties. What do you think of taking it out and providing it separately? > (it would also make the repo a lot lighter, space-wise) > > Cheers and thanks everyone for the awesome work! > > I'm happy if everybody else is happy (as long as we know whats missing).(Continue reading)
15 Mar 2011 23:33
Re: On shoebot-dq
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Stuart Axon <stuaxo2 <at> yahoo.com> wrote: >> From: ricardo lafuente <r <at> sollec.org> >> To: shoebot-devel <at> lists.tinkerhouse.net >> Sent: Mon, March 14, 2011 11:40:20 PM >> Subject: Re: [shoebot-devel] On shoebot-dq >> >> > Cool .. should we try and fix the two issues I mentioned (clipping and >>missing >> > image support first) ? >> > Or just get this one out and do those in 0.5 ? >> >> Image support is pretty important to have, but I'd rather push this in >> and then fix it for a 0.4.1. How does that sound? >> >> Sebastian also managed to convert the repository to Git -- >> http://gitorious.org/shoebot/shoebot-dq -- thus providing a good >> solution to our previous discussion about moving our repository and >> opting for a VCS. I've been working with Git lately and it's a pretty >> easy transition from Mercurial -- I could write a quick HOWTO if needed. >> >> Also -- I've been noticing that the colors library is spectacularly huge >> (tons of XML files), causing installation slowness and some other >> nasties. What do you think of taking it out and providing it separately? >> (it would also make the repo a lot lighter, space-wise) >> >> Cheers and thanks everyone for the awesome work! >> >> > > I'm happy if everybody else is happy (as long as we know whats missing).(Continue reading)
17 Mar 2011 18:15
Re: On shoebot-dq
Hi, Life is getting in the way of me helping much with the release at the mo, so I can't make changes myself (this might change soon). > > I agree on removing the IDE, Yup .. please do this, as I can't right now. Also - a small bugbear - the sbot.cmd I added has the executable bit set, so it shows up in the path on unix, if you could unset this too it would be awesome. >I'll look into auto competition and if > it's possible to create a client window, to use to try the > parametrization. > In gEdit ? - Sounds pretty good. > I think it would be easier to just zip the XMLs, just changing the > install script to unzip 'em at the install time. I remember we also > discussed separating the plugins and extras from the main code, now > would be a great time to do so. > > I am currently the admin at the gitorious repo, if anyone wants/needs > access, create an account and let me know and I'll add you to > commiters. Maybe once these small changes are in it might be worth making this the official repository (although getting rid of the -dq suffix might be nice).(Continue reading)
17 Mar 2011 20:18
Re: On shoebot-dq
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Stuart Axon <stuaxo2 <at> yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi, > Life is getting in the way of me helping much with the release at the mo, so I > can't make changes myself (this might change soon). > >> > >> I agree on removing the IDE, > > Yup .. please do this, as I can't right now. > > Also - a small bugbear - the sbot.cmd I added has the executable bit set, so it > shows up in the path on unix, if you could unset this too it would be awesome. > >>I'll look into auto competition and if >> it's possible to create a client window, to use to try the >> parametrization. >> > In gEdit ? - Sounds pretty good. > > > >> I think it would be easier to just zip the XMLs, just changing the >> install script to unzip 'em at the install time. I remember we also >> discussed separating the plugins and extras from the main code, now >> would be a great time to do so. >> >> I am currently the admin at the gitorious repo, if anyone wants/needs >> access, create an account and let me know and I'll add you to >> commiters.(Continue reading)
23 Mar 2011 20:52
Re: On shoebot-dq
> I removed the IDE now, and I think the sbot.cmd has been corrected, > let me know if it's not. > I did my first git push, changing this to only be copied if on windows (I didn't really understand setup.py enough before to realise that just setting it not executable was not enough - distutils automatically does that)
RSS Feed