3 Jan 2006 15:42
Re: my experience
Didi Rieder <adrieder <at> sbox.tugraz.at>
2006-01-03 14:42:25 GMT
2006-01-03 14:42:25 GMT
Quoting Didi Rieder <adrieder <at> sbox.tugraz.at>: > Quoting "Jose R. Roca" <joseroca <at> gmail.com>: > >> I basically ran into the same problem and I did basically the same thing you >> did, throw all the hardware I could find to the problem. Now, since my >> instalation was a new one and my users only had access to IMP without any >> other feature before hand, I just took out Nag which happens to be the >> application that runs that query each time a user logs in. As soon as I took >> Nag out everything ran smoothly. I dont know if you can make the same choice >> that I did since you might already have users using the old Nag, but I can >> say that it worked for me. >> >> Never acually tried seperating the history out of the Datatree might try >> that out now and try using the Nag application soon. > > I can only confirm this! > I'm running HEAD. But I also have huge mySQL performance problems as > soon as "Nag" is enabled. So it seems that the splitting of the > Datatree is not enough for a real speed up... > > ... at least not in an environment with more than several hundred > concurrent users. > And I can't believe that this is about hardware. We have 4 servers > acting as webservers behind a loadbalancer equipped with a SSL > crypto-card, and a separate 4 way 8GB system as mySQL server. > > I just wonder what "Nag" is doing. I already disabled the sharing > options for "Turba", "Kronolith" and "Nag". But the only thing which > helps to get the load from the mySQL server is to disable "Nag".(Continue reading)
RSS Feed