Horde Mimp mailing list ()

Jan Schneider | 18 May 2006 13:03

Re: RC2?

Zitat von Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck <at> horde.org>:

> Quoting Jan Schneider <jan <at> horde.org>:
>
>> Anyway, I think this is not a problem for the release version, we
>> should release MIMP 1.1 with mailbox cache at the same time we release
>> IMP 4.2 though.
>
> Okay, that makes sense.

Michael, any objections from your side?

Jan.

-- 
Do you need professional PHP or Horde consulting?
http://horde.org/consulting/

--

-- 
mimp mailing list - Join the hunt: http://horde.org/bounties/#mimp
Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/
To unsubscribe, mail: mimp-unsubscribe <at> lists.horde.org

headers

Michael M Slusarz | 18 May 2006 17:07

Re: RC2?

Quoting Jan Schneider <jan <at> horde.org>:

> Zitat von Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck <at> horde.org>:
>
>> Quoting Jan Schneider <jan <at> horde.org>:
>>
>>> Anyway, I think this is not a problem for the release version, we
>>> should release MIMP 1.1 with mailbox cache at the same time we release
>>> IMP 4.2 though.
>>
>> Okay, that makes sense.
>
> Michael, any objections from your side?

Sorry for the delay in responding to this...

Sounds fine.  current CVS seems to be pretty stable so I agree that  
adding anything for RC2 is not a great idea.  As far as the future - I  
was kind of hoping there would be no MIMP 1.1 release and that we  
would somehow fold mimp into imp by then.  But maybe that is a pie in  
the sky dream.

I have some time this morning so I will roll a RC2 release.

michael

___________________________________
Michael Slusarz [slusarz <at> horde.org]
--

-- 
mimp mailing list - Join the hunt: http://horde.org/bounties/#mimp

(Continue reading)

headers

Chuck Hagenbuch | 18 May 2006 17:13

Re: RC2?

Quoting Michael M Slusarz <slusarz <at> horde.org>:

> Sounds fine.  current CVS seems to be pretty stable so I agree that
> adding anything for RC2 is not a great idea.  As far as the future - I
> was kind of hoping there would be no MIMP 1.1 release and that we
> would somehow fold mimp into imp by then.  But maybe that is a pie in
> the sky dream.

I don't think it's unreasonable; at some point we'll want to seperate  
out the bits of IMP that both DIMP and MIMP use (okay, this naming  
scheme is cute but it is getting awkward ;) so that people don't  
_really_ need IMP just to run the mobile version, etc. But _that_ part  
can definitely wait.

Also, it's not pie-in-the-sky to say we'll do it for MIMP 1.1; we can  
just say there won't be a standalone MIMP 1.1. Done. :)

Oh, and I think we _should_ do this; the code that has to be merged to  
MIMP from IMP is enough already.

-chuck

-- 
"we are plastered to the windshield of the bus that is time." - Chris
--

-- 
mimp mailing list - Join the hunt: http://horde.org/bounties/#mimp
Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/
To unsubscribe, mail: mimp-unsubscribe <at> lists.horde.org

(Continue reading)