Re: Companions -> Chainsaw?

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Scott Deboy <scott.deboy <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, I pulled receivers and component companion sources into Chainsaw in svn
> 1178304.  Is deleting the entire component and receivers companions
> hierarchy from svn sufficient or do I need to do something else?

we need to update the website, i can help here if you like

> There is also the question of 'companions' only being one now (extras) - not
> sure what to do site-wise about that.  Maybe completely remove companions
> and just replace with 'extras'?  Or keep companions and only have extras in
> it?

Who is actually using extras? probably its time to go to attic too as
there is no development interest (have not a clue here).

Anyway I would remove the companions completely and replace it with
extras, as you suggested.

Cheers
Christian

>
> Scott
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Christian Grobmeier <grobmeier <at> gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Scott Deboy <scott.deboy <at> gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I would need to make a new release of Chainsaw after the log4j release
>> > at
>> > some point, assuming I needed other things from the updated version of
>> > log4j, but right now Chainsaw depends on 1.2.16 and bundles it in the
>> > standalone and DMG builds...so I think I'm ok.. (?)
>>
>> Yes, of course you are. I was thinking in the wrong direction. Seems
>> as I practice the "style of the drunken programmer" today.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Scott
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Christian Grobmeier
>> > <grobmeier <at> gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Scott Deboy <scott.deboy <at> gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > I'm leaning toward keeping them in the same package location - when
>> >> > log4j is
>> >> > released, I can remove the classes from Chainsaw and everything will
>> >> > still
>> >> > work.
>> >>
>> >> But you need to make a new release of chainsaw together with the new
>> >> release of log4j, right?
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Scott
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Christian Grobmeier
>> >> > <grobmeier <at> gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Scott Deboy <scott.deboy <at> gmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > I need to use some of the classes that were copied to core from
>> >> >> > receivers in
>> >> >> > 1165491 (rewriteappender, utillogginglevel)...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Will there be a log4j release soon or should I duplicate these
>> >> >> > classes
>> >> >> > in
>> >> >> > Chainsaw?  I don't want a log4j release to hold up a Chainsaw
>> >> >> > release.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I doubt there will be a new log4j release in near future. Therefore
>> >> >> I
>> >> >> am +1 on making Chainsaw independent. To my knowledge it is only 3
>> >> >> classes or so, I would go with duplicating them.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> But I think I would change the package to prevent a conflict with a
>> >> >> later log4j which might have the same classes
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Scott
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Scott Deboy
>> >> >> > <scott.deboy <at> gmail.com>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Definitely!
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Anything to simplify things and get this out the door!
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Thanks for all your help Christian,
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Scott
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Christian Grobmeier
>> >> >> >> <grobmeier <at> gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Scott Deboy
>> >> >> >>> <scott.deboy <at> gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> > ok, moving ahead with removal then
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Thanks, and have fun - removing old stuff makes me always feel
>> >> >> >>> good,
>> >> >> >>> hope it is the same feeling for you 
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Christian Grobmeier
>> >> >> >>> > <grobmeier <at> gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>> > wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Scott Deboy
>> >> >> >>> >> <scott.deboy <at> gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> > ok, I'll nuke component and receivers and pull the useful
>> >> >> >>> >> > bits
>> >> >> >>> >> > in
>> >> >> >>> >> > to
>> >> >> >>> >> > chainsaw...does that mean we should remove the parent maven
>> >> >> >>> >> > project
>> >> >> >>> >> > then?
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> If you speak of the parent for Companions: yes.
>> >> >> >>> >> I think we can remove the whole Companions tree to the attic
>> >> >> >>> >> then
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> Christian
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> > Scott
>> >> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Curt Arnold
>> >> >> >>> >> > <carnold <at> apache.org>
>> >> >> >>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> Forget the packaging renaming bit. No need to make
>> >> >> >>> >> >> Chainsaw
>> >> >> >>> >> >> an
>> >> >> >>> >> >> OSGi
>> >> >> >>> >> >> package and no need to add additional work.
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> >> >> >>> >> >> log4j-dev-unsubscribe <at> logging.apache.org
>> >> >> >>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> >> >> >>> >> >> log4j-dev-help <at> logging.apache.org
>> >> >> >>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >> >
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> --
>> >> >> >>> >> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> >> >> >>> >> log4j-dev-unsubscribe <at> logging.apache.org
>> >> >> >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> >> >> >>> >> log4j-dev-help <at> logging.apache.org
>> >> >> >>> >>
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> --
>> >> >> >>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe <at> logging.apache.org
>> >> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> >> >> >>> log4j-dev-help <at> logging.apache.org
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe <at> logging.apache.org
>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help <at> logging.apache.org
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe <at> logging.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help <at> logging.apache.org
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe <at> logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help <at> logging.apache.org
>>
>
>

--

-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de