Thomas Mahler | 1 Apr 2003 07:11
Picon

Re: Plans for implicit locking

Hi Nuno,

For ODMG no, for JDO yes.

If someone volunteers to implement it for ODMG I won't object!
For JDO it's mandatory, but requires nasty things like bytecode-enhancement.

It is very easy to build objects in a "cooperative" way. That is, if a 
setter is called first obtain a write lock. The Odmg persistent 
collections are built in this way.

cheers,
Thomas

Nuno Marques wrote:
> Hye,
> 
> Are there any plans to support implicit locking (on object change, during transaction) for future
versions of OJB?
> 
> Tia,
> 
> Nuno Marques
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Mail 
> O melhor e-mail gratuito da internet: 6MB de espaço, antivírus, acesso POP3, filtro contra spam.
(Continue reading)


Gmane