1 Apr 2003 07:11
Re: Plans for implicit locking
Thomas Mahler <thma32 <at> web.de>
2003-04-01 05:11:23 GMT
2003-04-01 05:11:23 GMT
Hi Nuno, For ODMG no, for JDO yes. If someone volunteers to implement it for ODMG I won't object! For JDO it's mandatory, but requires nasty things like bytecode-enhancement. It is very easy to build objects in a "cooperative" way. That is, if a setter is called first obtain a write lock. The Odmg persistent collections are built in this way. cheers, Thomas Nuno Marques wrote: > Hye, > > Are there any plans to support implicit locking (on object change, during transaction) for future versions of OJB? > > Tia, > > Nuno Marques > > > > --------------------------------- > Yahoo! Mail > O melhor e-mail gratuito da internet: 6MB de espaço, antivírus, acesso POP3, filtro contra spam.(Continue reading)
RSS Feed