kaustubh khasnis | 10 Feb 11:07
Picon

CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGEMENT equivalent for producers

Hi,
While producing the messages, is it possible to use something similar to
CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGEMENT so that we can acknowledge e.g. 100 messages in
batch or just recover??

--Kaustubh
Gary Tully | 10 Feb 12:33
Picon
Gravatar

Re: CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGEMENT equivalent for producers

producers can use transactions to batch a send, each send within a
transaction will be sent async by default and the commit will be a
sync call.

On 10 February 2012 10:07, kaustubh khasnis
<kaustubh.khasnis@...> wrote:
> Hi,
> While producing the messages, is it possible to use something similar to
> CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGEMENT so that we can acknowledge e.g. 100 messages in
> batch or just recover??
>
> --Kaustubh

--

-- 
http://fusesource.com
http://blog.garytully.com

kaustubh khasnis | 13 Feb 09:18
Picon

Re: CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGEMENT equivalent for producers

Hi ,
Can you please give us some insight upon what will be the overhead of using
transactions?

Also can you please tell if there are any alternatives?

--Kaustubh

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Gary Tully <gary.tully@...> wrote:

> producers can use transactions to batch a send, each send within a
> transaction will be sent async by default and the commit will be a
> sync call.
>
> On 10 February 2012 10:07, kaustubh khasnis <kaustubh.khasnis@...>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > While producing the messages, is it possible to use something similar to
> > CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGEMENT so that we can acknowledge e.g. 100 messages in
> > batch or just recover??
> >
> > --Kaustubh
>
>
>
> --
> http://fusesource.com
> http://blog.garytully.com
>
(Continue reading)


Gmane