10 Feb 11:07
10 Feb 12:33
Re: CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGEMENT equivalent for producers
producers can use transactions to batch a send, each send within a transaction will be sent async by default and the commit will be a sync call. On 10 February 2012 10:07, kaustubh khasnis <kaustubh.khasnis@...> wrote: > Hi, > While producing the messages, is it possible to use something similar to > CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGEMENT so that we can acknowledge e.g. 100 messages in > batch or just recover?? > > --Kaustubh -- -- http://fusesource.com http://blog.garytully.com
13 Feb 09:18
Re: CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGEMENT equivalent for producers
Hi , Can you please give us some insight upon what will be the overhead of using transactions? Also can you please tell if there are any alternatives? --Kaustubh On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Gary Tully <gary.tully@...> wrote: > producers can use transactions to batch a send, each send within a > transaction will be sent async by default and the commit will be a > sync call. > > On 10 February 2012 10:07, kaustubh khasnis <kaustubh.khasnis@...> > wrote: > > Hi, > > While producing the messages, is it possible to use something similar to > > CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGEMENT so that we can acknowledge e.g. 100 messages in > > batch or just recover?? > > > > --Kaustubh > > > > -- > http://fusesource.com > http://blog.garytully.com >(Continue reading)
RSS Feed