22 Jun 2012 01:55
22 Jun 2012 01:57
Re: Seam 3.1.1 status
+1 to 3.1.1.Final. Em 21/06/2012, às 20:55, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum <at> gmail.com> escreveu: > I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam > mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in > non-SNAPSHOT form. > > Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do > individual module releases as needed? > > -C > _______________________________________________ > seam-dev mailing list > seam-dev <at> lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev <at> lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
22 Jun 2012 03:10
Re: Seam 3.1.1 status
+1, I'm voting for 3.2.0 myself, unless we can make sure that the security stuff is also released with 3.1.1.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:57 PM, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
+1 to 3.1.1.Final.
Em 21/06/2012, às 20:55, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> escreveu:
> I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
> mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
> non-SNAPSHOT form.
>
> Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
> individual module releases as needed?
>
> -C
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev-yyZXR9kdEHCUeimprIcsAw@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev-yyZXR9kdEHCUeimprIcsAw@public.gmane.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
<div> <p>+1, I'm voting for 3.2.0 myself, unless we can make sure that the security stuff is also released with 3.1.1.<br><br></p> <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:57 PM, George Gastaldi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gegastaldi@..." target="_blank">gegastaldi@...</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">+1 to 3.1.1.Final.<br><br><br> Em 21/06/2012, às 20:55, Cody Lerum <<a href="mailto:cody.lerum <at> gmail.com">cody.lerum@...</a>> escreveu:<br><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"> <br> > I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam<br> > mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in<br> > non-SNAPSHOT form.<br> ><br> > Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do<br> > individual module releases as needed?<br> ><br> > -C<br> > _______________________________________________<br> > seam-dev mailing list<br> > <a href="mailto:seam-dev@...">seam-dev@...</a><br> > <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev</a><br><br> _______________________________________________<br> seam-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:seam-dev@...">seam-dev@...</a><br><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev</a><br> </div></div> </blockquote> </div> <br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Lincoln Baxter, III<br><a href="http://ocpsoft.org" target="_blank">http://ocpsoft.org</a><br>"Simpler is better."<br> </div>
22 Jun 2012 04:45
Re: Seam 3.1.1 status
Is there still work to do on Security or are we at a place where we can release what we have? On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter <at> gmail.com> wrote: > +1, I'm voting for 3.2.0 myself, unless we can make sure that the security > stuff is also released with 3.1.1. > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:57 PM, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi <at> gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> +1 to 3.1.1.Final. >> >> >> Em 21/06/2012, às 20:55, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum <at> gmail.com> escreveu: >> >> > I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam >> > mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in >> > non-SNAPSHOT form. >> > >> > Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do >> > individual module releases as needed? >> > >> > -C >> > _______________________________________________ >> > seam-dev mailing list >> > seam-dev <at> lists.jboss.org >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> seam-dev mailing list >> seam-dev <at> lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev > > > > > -- > Lincoln Baxter, III > http://ocpsoft.org > "Simpler is better." _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev <at> lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
22 Jun 2012 15:50
Re: Seam 3.1.1 status
Im pretty sure the basic security module is working well. Im not sure about the external module, where I had a few deployment issues on as7 lately and stopped using it. (i know, irresponsible me)
ill try to reproduce and file a bug report
---
Lincoln Baxter's Droid
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
On Jun 21, 2012 10:45 PM, "Cody Lerum" <cody.lerum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
Is there still work to do on Security or are we at a place where we
can release what we have?
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III
<lincolnbaxter-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> +1, I'm voting for 3.2.0 myself, unless we can make sure that the security
> stuff is also released with 3.1.1.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:57 PM, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> +1 to 3.1.1.Final.
>>
>>
>> Em 21/06/2012, às 20:55, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> escreveu:
>>
>> > I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
>> > mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
>> > non-SNAPSHOT form.
>> >
>> > Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
>> > individual module releases as needed?
>> >
>> > -C
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > seam-dev mailing list
>> > seam-dev-yyZXR9kdEHA@public.gmane.orgoss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>> seam-dev-yyZXR9kdEHCnNFVqDHBX1A@public.gmane.orgrg
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Lincoln Baxter, III
> http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
<div> <p>Im pretty sure the basic security module is working well. Im not sure about the external module, where I had a few deployment issues on as7 lately and stopped using it. (i know, irresponsible me)</p> <p>ill try to reproduce and file a bug report</p> <p>---<br> Lincoln Baxter's Droid<br><a href="http://ocpsoft.org">http://ocpsoft.org</a><br> "Simpler is better."</p> <div class="gmail_quote">On Jun 21, 2012 10:45 PM, "Cody Lerum" <<a href="mailto:cody.lerum@...">cody.lerum@...</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote"> Is there still work to do on Security or are we at a place where we<br> can release what we have?<br><br> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III<br> <<a href="mailto:lincolnbaxter@...">lincolnbaxter@...</a>> wrote:<br> > +1, I'm voting for 3.2.0 myself, unless we can make sure that the security<br> > stuff is also released with 3.1.1.<br> ><br> ><br> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:57 PM, George Gastaldi <<a href="mailto:gegastaldi@...">gegastaldi@...</a>><br> > wrote:<br> >><br> >> +1 to 3.1.1.Final.<br> >><br> >><br> >> Em 21/06/2012, às 20:55, Cody Lerum <<a href="mailto:cody.lerum@...">cody.lerum@...</a>> escreveu:<br> >><br> >> > I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam<br> >> > mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in<br> >> > non-SNAPSHOT form.<br> >> ><br> >> > Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do<br> >> > individual module releases as needed?<br> >> ><br> >> > -C<br> >> > _______________________________________________<br> >> > seam-dev mailing list<br> >> > <a href="mailto:seam-dev@...">seam-dev@...oss.org</a><br> >> > <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev</a><br> >><br> >> _______________________________________________<br> >> seam-dev mailing list<br> >> <a href="mailto:seam-dev@...">seam-dev@...rg</a><br> >> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev</a><br> ><br> ><br> ><br> ><br> > --<br> > Lincoln Baxter, III<br> > <a href="http://ocpsoft.org" target="_blank">http://ocpsoft.org</a><br> > "Simpler is better."<br> </blockquote> </div> </div>
22 Jun 2012 18:32
Re: Seam 3.1.1 status
External module? On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter <at> gmail.com> wrote: > Im pretty sure the basic security module is working well. Im not sure about > the external module, where I had a few deployment issues on as7 lately and > stopped using it. (i know, irresponsible me) > > ill try to reproduce and file a bug report > > --- > Lincoln Baxter's Droid > > > http://ocpsoft.org > "Simpler is better." > > On Jun 21, 2012 10:45 PM, "Cody Lerum" <cody.lerum <at> gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Is there still work to do on Security or are we at a place where we >> can release what we have? >> >> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III >> <lincolnbaxter <at> gmail.com> wrote: >> > +1, I'm voting for 3.2.0 myself, unless we can make sure that the >> > security >> > stuff is also released with 3.1.1. >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:57 PM, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi <at> gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> +1 to 3.1.1.Final. >> >> >> >> >> >> Em 21/06/2012, às 20:55, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum <at> gmail.com> escreveu: >> >> >> >> > I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the >> >> > Seam >> >> > mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in >> >> > non-SNAPSHOT form. >> >> > >> >> > Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do >> >> > individual module releases as needed? >> >> > >> >> > -C >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > seam-dev mailing list >> >> > seam-dev <at> lists.jboss.org >> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> seam-dev mailing list >> >> seam-dev <at> lists.jboss.org >> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Lincoln Baxter, III >> > http://ocpsoft.org >> > "Simpler is better." _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev <at> lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
23 Jun 2012 16:29
Re: Seam 3.1.1 status
Security has an external extensions module, which are additional authentication integrations. I don't know much other than that about it.
-Dan
--
Sent from my CyanogenMod-powered
Android device, an open platform for
carriers, developers and consumers.
On Jun 22, 2012 10:33 AM, "Cody Lerum" <cody.lerum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
External module?
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III
<lincolnbaxter-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Im pretty sure the basic security module is working well. Im not sure about
> the external module, where I had a few deployment issues on as7 lately and
> stopped using it. (i know, irresponsible me)
>
> ill try to reproduce and file a bug report
>
> ---
> Lincoln Baxter's Droid
>
>
> http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
>
> On Jun 21, 2012 10:45 PM, "Cody Lerum" <cody.lerum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>
>> Is there still work to do on Security or are we at a place where we
>> can release what we have?
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III
>> <lincolnbaxter <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>> > +1, I'm voting for 3.2.0 myself, unless we can make sure that the
>> > security
>> > stuff is also released with 3.1.1.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:57 PM, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> +1 to 3.1.1.Final.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Em 21/06/2012, às 20:55, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> escreveu:
>> >>
>> >> > I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the
>> >> > Seam
>> >> > mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
>> >> > non-SNAPSHOT form.
>> >> >
>> >> > Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
>> >> > individual module releases as needed?
>> >> >
>> >> > -C
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > seam-dev mailing list
>> >> > seam-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
>> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> seam-dev mailing list
>> >> seam-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Lincoln Baxter, III
>> > http://ocpsoft.org
>> > "Simpler is better."
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev-yyZXR9kdEHCUeimprIcsAw@public.gmane.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
<div> <p>Security has an external extensions module, which are additional authentication integrations. I don't know much other than that about it.</p> <p>-Dan</p> <p>--<br> Sent from my CyanogenMod-powered<br> Android device, an open platform for<br> carriers, developers and consumers.</p> <div class="gmail_quote">On Jun 22, 2012 10:33 AM, "Cody Lerum" <<a href="mailto:cody.lerum@...">cody.lerum@...</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote"> External module?<br><br> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III<br> <<a href="mailto:lincolnbaxter@...">lincolnbaxter@...</a>> wrote:<br> > Im pretty sure the basic security module is working well. Im not sure about<br> > the external module, where I had a few deployment issues on as7 lately and<br> > stopped using it. (i know, irresponsible me)<br> ><br> > ill try to reproduce and file a bug report<br> ><br> > ---<br> > Lincoln Baxter's Droid<br> ><br> ><br> > <a href="http://ocpsoft.org" target="_blank">http://ocpsoft.org</a><br> > "Simpler is better."<br> ><br> > On Jun 21, 2012 10:45 PM, "Cody Lerum" <<a href="mailto:cody.lerum@...">cody.lerum@...</a>> wrote:<br> >><br> >> Is there still work to do on Security or are we at a place where we<br> >> can release what we have?<br> >><br> >> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III<br> >> <<a href="mailto:lincolnbaxter@...">lincolnbaxter <at> gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> >> > +1, I'm voting for 3.2.0 myself, unless we can make sure that the<br> >> > security<br> >> > stuff is also released with 3.1.1.<br> >> ><br> >> ><br> >> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:57 PM, George Gastaldi <<a href="mailto:gegastaldi@...">gegastaldi@...</a>><br> >> > wrote:<br> >> >><br> >> >> +1 to 3.1.1.Final.<br> >> >><br> >> >><br> >> >> Em 21/06/2012, às 20:55, Cody Lerum <<a href="mailto:cody.lerum@...">cody.lerum@...</a>> escreveu:<br> >> >><br> >> >> > I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the<br> >> >> > Seam<br> >> >> > mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in<br> >> >> > non-SNAPSHOT form.<br> >> >> ><br> >> >> > Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do<br> >> >> > individual module releases as needed?<br> >> >> ><br> >> >> > -C<br> >> >> > _______________________________________________<br> >> >> > seam-dev mailing list<br> >> >> > <a href="mailto:seam-dev@...">seam-dev <at> lists.jboss.org</a><br> >> >> > <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev</a><br> >> >><br> >> >> _______________________________________________<br> >> >> seam-dev mailing list<br> >> >> <a href="mailto:seam-dev@...">seam-dev <at> lists.jboss.org</a><br> >> >> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev</a><br> >> ><br> >> ><br> >> ><br> >> ><br> >> > --<br> >> > Lincoln Baxter, III<br> >> > <a href="http://ocpsoft.org" target="_blank">http://ocpsoft.org</a><br> >> > "Simpler is better."<br><br> _______________________________________________<br> seam-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:seam-dev@...">seam-dev@...</a><br><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev</a><br> </blockquote> </div> </div>
26 Jun 2012 15:59
Re: Seam 3.1.1 status
We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x, there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for a release. Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike for any new features and ongoing development. On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote: > I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam > mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in > non-SNAPSHOT form. > > Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do > individual module releases as needed? > > -C > _______________________________________________ > seam-dev mailing list > seam-dev@... > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
26 Jun 2012 16:35
Re: Seam 3.1.1 status
Maybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS is ready to accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?
Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such as mail. Last I heard DS was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi enhancement) until it hit a certain point of maturity. Is that still the case?
-C
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:
We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x, there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for a release. Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike for any new features and ongoing development.
On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
non-SNAPSHOT form.
Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
individual module releases as needed?
-C
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev-yyZXR9kdEHCUeimprIcsAw@public.gmane.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
<div> <p>Maybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS is ready to accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?<span></span></p> <div><br></div> <div>Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such as mail. Last I heard DS was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi enhancement) until it hit a certain point of maturity. Is that still the case?</div> <div><br></div> <div>-C<br><div> <br>On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x, there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for a release. Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike for any new features and ongoing development.<br><br> On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote"> I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam<br> mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in<br> non-SNAPSHOT form.<br><br> Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do<br> individual module releases as needed?<br><br> -C<br> _______________________________________________<br> seam-dev mailing list<br><a>seam-dev@...</a><br><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev</a><br> </blockquote> <br> </blockquote> </div> </div> </div>
26 Jun 2012 17:37
Re: Seam 3.1.1 status
There's nothing stopping a module from doing their own release. I'd keep it in the 3.1.X releases though to say its compatible with Seam 3.1. I also need to bring up the idea of a DeltaSpike sandbox so we have somewhere to put all these extensions before they are pulled into the core. I haven't gotten to it yet
Sent from my iPhone
Sent from my iPhone
Maybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS is ready to accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such a s mail. Last I heard DS was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi enhancement) until it hit a certain point of maturity. Is that still the case?-C
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x, there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for a release. Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike for any new features and ongoing development.
On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
non-SNAPSHOT form.
Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
individual module releases as needed?
-C
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev-yyZXR9kdEHCUeimprIcsAw@public.gmane.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev-yyZXR9kdEHCUeimprIcsAw@public.gmane.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
<div> <div>There's nothing stopping a module from doing their own release. I'd keep it in the 3.1.X releases though to say its compatible with Seam 3.1. I also need to bring up the idea of a DeltaSpike sandbox so we have somewhere to put all these extensions before they are pulled into the core. I haven't gotten to it yet<br><br>Sent from my iPhone</div> <div> <br>On Jun 26, 2012, at 10:35, Cody Lerum <<a href="mailto:cody.lerum@...">cody.lerum@...</a>> wrote:<br><br> </div> <div></div> <blockquote type="cite"><div>Maybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS is ready to accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?<span></span><div><br></div> <div>Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such a s mail. Last I heard DS was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi enhancement) until it hit a certain point of maturity. Is that still the case?</div> <div><br></div> <div>-C<br><div> <br>On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x, there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for a release. Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike for any new features and ongoing development.<br><br> On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote"> I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam<br> mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in<br> non-SNAPSHOT form.<br><br> Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do<br> individual module releases as needed?<br><br> -C<br> _______________________________________________<br> seam-dev mailing list<br><a>seam-dev@...</a><br><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev</a><br> </blockquote> <br> </blockquote> </div> </div> </div></blockquote> <blockquote type="cite"><div> <span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>seam-dev mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:seam-dev@...">seam-dev@...</a></span><br><span><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev</a></span><br> </div></blockquote> </div>
26 Jun 2012 17:54
Re: Seam 3.1.1 status
+1 to the sandbox on Deltaspike
Enviado via iPhone
Enviado via iPhone
There's nothing stopping a module from doing their own release. I'd keep it in the 3.1.X releases though to say its compatible with Seam 3.1. I also need to bring up the idea of a DeltaSpike sandbox so we have somewhere to put all these extensions before they are pulled into the core. I haven't gotten to it yet
Sent from my iPhoneMaybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS is ready to accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such as mail. Last I heard DS was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi enhancement) until it hit a certain point of maturity. Is that still the case?-C
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x, there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for a release. Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike for any new features and ongoing development.
On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
non-SNAPSHOT form.
Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
individual module releases as needed?
-C
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev-yyZXR9kdEHCUeimprIcsAw@public.gmane.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev-yyZXR9kdEHCUeimprIcsAw@public.gmane.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev <at> lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
<div> <div>+1 to the sandbox on Deltaspike<br><br>Enviado via iPhone</div> <div> <br>Em 26/06/2012, às 11:37, Jason Porter <<a href="mailto:lightguard.jp@...">lightguard.jp <at> gmail.com</a>> escreveu:<br><br> </div> <div></div> <blockquote type="cite"><div> <div>There's nothing stopping a module from doing their own release. I'd keep it in the 3.1.X releases though to say its compatible with Seam 3.1. I also need to bring up the idea of a DeltaSpike sandbox so we have somewhere to put all these extensions before they are pulled into the core. I haven't gotten to it yet<br><br>Sent from my iPhone</div> <div> <br>On Jun 26, 2012, at 10:35, Cody Lerum <<a href="mailto:cody.lerum@...">cody.lerum <at> gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br> </div> <div></div> <blockquote type="cite"><div>Maybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS is ready to accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?<span></span><div><br></div> <div>Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such as mail. Last I heard DS was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi enhancement) until it hit a certain point of maturity. Is that still the case?</div> <div><br></div> <div>-C<br><div> <br>On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x, there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for a release. Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike for any new features and ongoing development.<br><br> On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote"> I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam<br> mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in<br> non-SNAPSHOT form.<br><br> Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do<br> individual module releases as needed?<br><br> -C<br> _______________________________________________<br> seam-dev mailing list<br><a>seam-dev@...</a><br><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev</a><br> </blockquote> <br> </blockquote> </div> </div> </div></blockquote> <blockquote type="cite"><div> <span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>seam-dev mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:seam-dev@...">seam-dev@...</a></span><br><span><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev</a></span><br> </div></blockquote> </div></blockquote> <blockquote type="cite"><div> <span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>seam-dev mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:seam-dev@...">seam-dev <at> lists.jboss.org</a></span><br><span><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev</a></span><br> </div></blockquote> </div>
26 Jun 2012 21:22
Re: Seam 3.1.1 status
I don't know how much Seam 3 momentum remains, but the sooner the better for the sandbox.
On Jun 26, 2012 11:37 AM, "Jason Porter" <lightguard.jp-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
There's nothing stopping a module from doing their own release. I'd keep it in the 3.1.X releases though to say its compatible with Seam 3.1. I also need to bring up the idea of a DeltaSpike sandbox so we have somewhere to put all these extensions before they are pulled into the core. I haven't gotten to it yet
Sent from my iPhoneMaybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS is ready to accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such as mail. Last I heard DS was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi enhancement) until it hit a certain point of maturity. Is that still the case?-C
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x, there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for a release. Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike for any new features and ongoing development.
On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
non-SNAPSHOT form.
Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
individual module releases as needed?
-C
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev-yyZXR9kdEHCUeimprIcsAw@public.gmane.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev-yyZXR9kdEHCUeimprIcsAw@public.gmane.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
<div> <p>I don't know how much Seam 3 momentum remains, but the sooner the better for the sandbox.</p> <div class="gmail_quote">On Jun 26, 2012 11:37 AM, "Jason Porter" <<a href="mailto:lightguard.jp@...">lightguard.jp@...</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote"> <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <div>There's nothing stopping a module from doing their own release. I'd keep it in the 3.1.X releases though to say its compatible with Seam 3.1. I also need to bring up the idea of a DeltaSpike sandbox so we have somewhere to put all these extensions before they are pulled into the core. I haven't gotten to it yet<br><br>Sent from my iPhone</div> <div> <br>On Jun 26, 2012, at 10:35, Cody Lerum <<a href="mailto:cody.lerum@..." target="_blank">cody.lerum <at> gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br> </div> <div></div> <blockquote type="cite"><div> Maybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS is ready to accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?<span></span><div><br></div> <div>Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such as mail. Last I heard DS was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi enhancement) until it hit a certain point of maturity. Is that still the case?</div> <div><br></div> <div>-C<br><div> <br>On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x, there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for a release. Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike for any new features and ongoing development.<br><br> On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote"> I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam<br> mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in<br> non-SNAPSHOT form.<br><br> Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do<br> individual module releases as needed?<br><br> -C<br> _______________________________________________<br> seam-dev mailing list<br><a>seam-dev@...</a><br><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev</a><br> </blockquote> <br> </blockquote> </div> </div> </div></blockquote> <blockquote type="cite"><div> <span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>seam-dev mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:seam-dev@..." target="_blank">seam-dev@...</a></span><br><span><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev</a></span><br> </div></blockquote> </div> </blockquote> </div> </div>
26 Jun 2012 23:00
Re: Seam 3.1.1 status
If Seam 3.x is in a discontinued state, it'd be great getting sandbox added to DeltaSpike.
+1 for that :)
On Jun 26, 2012, at 5:37 PM, Jason Porter wrote:
_______________________________________________There's nothing stopping a module from doing their own release. I'd keep it in the 3.1.X releases though to say its compatible with Seam 3.1. I also need to bring up the idea of a DeltaSpike sandbox so we have somewhere to put all these extensions before they are pulled into the core. I haven't gotten to it yet
Sent from my iPhoneMaybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS is ready to accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such as mail. Last I heard DS was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi enhancement) until it hit a certain point of maturity. Is that still the case?-C
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x, there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for a release. Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike for any new features and ongoing development.
On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
non-SNAPSHOT form.
Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
individual module releases as needed?
-C
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev-yyZXR9kdEHCUeimprIcsAw@public.gmane.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev-yyZXR9kdEHCUeimprIcsAw@public.gmane.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev-yyZXR9kdEHCUeimprIcsAw@public.gmane.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
<div>If Seam 3.x is in a discontinued state, it'd be great getting sandbox added to DeltaSpike.<div><br></div> <div>+1 for that :)<br><div> <br><div> <div>On Jun 26, 2012, at 5:37 PM, Jason Porter wrote:</div> <br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"> <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <div>There's nothing stopping a module from doing their own release. I'd keep it in the 3.1.X releases though to say its compatible with Seam 3.1. I also need to bring up the idea of a DeltaSpike sandbox so we have somewhere to put all these extensions before they are pulled into the core. I haven't gotten to it yet<br><br>Sent from my iPhone</div> <div> <br>On Jun 26, 2012, at 10:35, Cody Lerum <<a href="mailto:cody.lerum@...">cody.lerum@...</a>> wrote:<br><br> </div> <div></div> <blockquote type="cite"><div>Maybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS is ready to accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?<span></span><div><br></div> <div>Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such as mail. Last I heard DS was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi enhancement) until it hit a certain point of maturity. Is that still the case?</div> <div><br></div> <div>-C<br><div> <br>On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x, there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for a release. Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike for any new features and ongoing development.<br><br> On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote"> I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam<br> mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in<br> non-SNAPSHOT form.<br><br> Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do<br> individual module releases as needed?<br><br> -C<br> _______________________________________________<br> seam-dev mailing list<br><a>seam-dev@...</a><br><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev</a><br> </blockquote> <br> </blockquote> </div> </div> </div></blockquote> <blockquote type="cite"><div> <span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>seam-dev mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:seam-dev@...">seam-dev@...</a></span><br><span><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev</a></span><br> </div></blockquote> </div>_______________________________________________<br>seam-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:seam-dev@...">seam-dev@...</a><br>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev<br> </blockquote> </div> <br> </div> </div> </div>
26 Jun 2012 23:56
Re: Seam 3.1.1 status
I see a lot of these emails simply going to seam-dev. Please please forward or respond to deltaspike-dev as well (unless you need to be a member, in that case they may bounce or wait to be allowed in).
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Ove Ranheim <oranheim-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
If Seam 3.x is in a discontinued state, it'd be great getting sandbox added to DeltaSpike.+1 for that :)On Jun 26, 2012, at 5:37 PM, Jason Porter wrote:_______________________________________________There's nothing stopping a module from doing their own release. I'd keep it in the 3.1.X releases though to say its compatible with Seam 3.1. I also need to bring up the idea of a DeltaSpike sandbox so we have somewhere to put all these extensions before they are pulled into the core. I haven't gotten to it yet
Sent from my iPhoneMaybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS is ready to accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such as mail. Last I heard DS was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi enhancement) until it hit a certain point of maturity. Is that still the case?-C
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x, there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for a release. Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike for any new features and ongoing development.
On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
non-SNAPSHOT form.
Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
individual module releases as needed?
-C
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev-yyZXR9kdEHCUeimprIcsAw@public.gmane.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev-yyZXR9kdEHCUeimprIcsAw@public.gmane.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev-yyZXR9kdEHCUeimprIcsAw@public.gmane.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
Jason Porter
http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
Software Engineer
Open Source Advocate
Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling
PGP key id: 926CCFF5
PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
<div> <p>I see a lot of these emails simply going to seam-dev. Please please forward or respond to deltaspike-dev as well (unless you need to be a member, in that case they may bounce or wait to be allowed in).<br><br></p> <div class="gmail_quote"> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Ove Ranheim <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:oranheim@..." target="_blank">oranheim@...</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote"> <div>If Seam 3.x is in a discontinued state, it'd be great getting sandbox added to DeltaSpike.<div><br></div> <div>+1 for that :)<div><div class="h5"> <br><div> <br><div> <div>On Jun 26, 2012, at 5:37 PM, Jason Porter wrote:</div> <br><blockquote type="cite"> <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <div>There's nothing stopping a module from doing their own release. I'd keep it in the 3.1.X releases though to say its compatible with Seam 3.1. I also need to bring up the idea of a DeltaSpike sandbox so we have somewhere to put all these extensions before they are pulled into the core. I haven't gotten to it yet<br><br>Sent from my iPhone</div> <div> <br>On Jun 26, 2012, at 10:35, Cody Lerum <<a href="mailto:cody.lerum@..." target="_blank">cody.lerum <at> gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br> </div> <div></div> <blockquote type="cite"><div> Maybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS is ready to accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?<span></span><div><br></div> <div>Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such as mail. Last I heard DS was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi enhancement) until it hit a certain point of maturity. Is that still the case?</div> <div><br></div> <div>-C<br><div> <br>On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote">We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x, there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for a release. Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike for any new features and ongoing development.<br><br> On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote"> I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam<br> mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in<br> non-SNAPSHOT form.<br><br> Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do<br> individual module releases as needed?<br><br> -C<br> _______________________________________________<br> seam-dev mailing list<br><a>seam-dev@...</a><br><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev</a><br> </blockquote> <br> </blockquote> </div> </div> </div></blockquote> <blockquote type="cite"><div> <span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>seam-dev mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:seam-dev@..." target="_blank">seam-dev@...</a></span><br><span><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev</a></span><br> </div></blockquote> </div>_______________________________________________<br> seam-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:seam-dev@..." target="_blank">seam-dev@...</a><br><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev</a><br> </blockquote> </div> <br> </div> </div></div> </div> </div> </blockquote> </div> <br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Jason Porter<br><a href="http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com" target="_blank">http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com</a><br><a href="http://twitter.com/lightguardjp" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/lightguardjp</a><br><br>Software Engineer<br>Open Source Advocate<br>Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling<br><br>PGP key id: 926CCFF5<br> PGP key available at: <a href="http://keyserver.net" target="_blank">keyserver.net</a>, <a href="http://pgp.mit.edu" target="_blank">pgp.mit.edu</a><br> </div>
RSS Feed