1 Oct 2010 09:10
Re: [rules-dev] drools-guvnor and drools-factcontstraints: commit before Friday
Anstis, Michael (M. <manstis1 <at> ford.com>
2010-10-01 07:10:02 GMT
2010-10-01 07:10:02 GMT
Understood. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: rules-dev-bounces <at> lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-dev-bounces <at> lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Geoffrey De Smet Sent: 01 October 2010 07:53 To: rules-dev <at> lists.jboss.org Subject: Re: [rules-dev] drools-guvnor and drools-factcontstraints: commit before Friday > Does this distinction make the full deployment of Guvnor two WARs? No, drools-guvnor-server depends on drools-guvnor-gwtclient (= results in a war overlay) so there's only one war: drools-guvnor-server. That might be a good reason why we want to call it drools-guvnor instead of drools-guvnor-server > I assume drools-guvnor\src\main\webapp will be deleted in its entirety? No, just the generated gwt client part will be deleted from svn: drools-guvnor\src\main\webapp\org.drools.guvnor.Guvnor With kind regards, Geoffrey De Smet Op 29-09-10 21:21, Michael Anstis schreef: > Great stuff. > > Any idea what's happening with the current drools-guvnor\modules(Continue reading)
RSS Feed