wesley jordan | 15 May 08:58

Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug

Hi all,

I have abit of a strange problem with the dwr.util.removeAllRows and dwr.util.addRows methods.

The situation is this:

I have a table populated with a bunch of rows. Each row contains information and on the left of each row there is an image. If a user clicks on an image a javascript method is called which calls a 'dwr-exposed' bean to retrieve data and that data is used to build a table beneath the row (using dwr.util.removeAllRows and dwr.util.addRows) . The user can then click on the image again to remove the dynamically created table.

The problem i'm experiencing is this:

After a user clicks the image for the second time with the intent to hide the dynamically created table, the space that the dynamically created table occupied is never 'reclaimed'. So lets say that dynamically created table occupied 100pixels length beneath the selected row, upon clicking the image to hide the dynamically created table, there is still 100pixels space between the 2 rows. What's worse is that everytime the operation is repeated the space will grow by 100pixels. I've tested this on IE6,Opera 9.26 and Firefox 3 beta and they all work fine. I've scrutinised the output provided in Firebug and nothing shows up to indicate anything is wrong.

Any help with this is greatly appreciated

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
Mike Wilson | 15 May 09:44

RE: Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug

I'd suggest two things:
  1. Examine the resulting HTML after doing the dwr.util stuff. You can use the "View Generated Source" feature of the FF Web Developer add-on.
  2. Make a simple client-side only example (ie only including a static util.js) that reproduces the problem and post to the list.
Best regards
Mike Wilson

From: wesley jordan [mailto:jordan.wesley-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org]
Sent: den 15 maj 2008 08:59
To: users-EyPigyGktj4FDOXUYO6UHQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: [dwr-user] Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug

Hi all,

I have abit of a strange problem with the dwr.util.removeAllRows and dwr.util.addRows methods.

The situation is this:

I have a table populated with a bunch of rows. Each row contains information and on the left of each row there is an image. If a user clicks on an image a javascript method is called which calls a 'dwr-exposed' bean to retrieve data and that data is used to build a table beneath the row (using dwr.util.removeAllRows and dwr.util.addRows) . The user can then click on the image again to remove the dynamically created table.

The problem i'm experiencing is this:

After a user clicks the image for the second time with the intent to hide the dynamically created table, the space that the dynamically created table occupied is never 'reclaimed'. So lets say that dynamically created table occupied 100pixels length beneath the selected row, upon clicking the image to hide the dynamically created table, there is still 100pixels space between the 2 rows. What's worse is that everytime the operation is repeated the space will grow by 100pixels. I've tested this on IE6,Opera 9.26 and Firefox 3 beta and they all work fine. I've scrutinised the output provided in Firebug and nothing shows up to indicate anything is wrong.

Any help with this is greatly appreciated
wessie | 15 May 09:56

RE: Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug


Hi mikewise,

Thanks for the quick and helpful response.

I'm busy implementing your first suggestion, but how would I go about doing
the second ("including a static
util.js") ?

Thanks for the feedback again.

mikewse wrote:
> 
> I'd suggest two things:
> 
> 1.	
> 
> 	Examine the resulting HTML after doing the dwr.util stuff. You can
> use the "View Generated Source" feature of the FF Web Developer add-on.
> 2.	
> 
> 	Make a simple client-side only example (ie only including a static
> util.js) that reproduces the problem and post to the list.
> 
> Best regards
> Mike Wilson
> 
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: wesley jordan [mailto:jordan.wesley@...] 
> Sent: den 15 maj 2008 08:59
> To: users@...
> Subject: [dwr-user] Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I have abit of a strange problem with the dwr.util.removeAllRows and
> dwr.util.addRows methods.
> 
> The situation is this:
> 
> I have a table populated with a bunch of rows. Each row contains
> information
> and on the left of each row there is an image. If a user clicks on an
> image
> a javascript method is called which calls a 'dwr-exposed' bean to retrieve
> data and that data is used to build a table beneath the row (using
> dwr.util.removeAllRows and dwr.util.addRows) . The user can then click on
> the image again to remove the dynamically created table.
> 
> The problem i'm experiencing is this:
> 
> After a user clicks the image for the second time with the intent to hide
> the dynamically created table, the space that the dynamically created
> table
> occupied is never 'reclaimed'. So lets say that dynamically created table
> occupied 100pixels length beneath the selected row, upon clicking the
> image
> to hide the dynamically created table, there is still 100pixels space
> between the 2 rows. What's worse is that everytime the operation is
> repeated
> the space will grow by 100pixels. I've tested this on IE6,Opera 9.26 and
> Firefox 3 beta and they all work fine. I've scrutinised the output
> provided
> in Firebug and nothing shows up to indicate anything is wrong.
> 
> Any help with this is greatly appreciated
> 
> 
> 
> 

--

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Firefox-2.0.0.14-dwr-utils-bug-tp17247178p17247977.html
Sent from the DWR - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Mike Wilson | 15 May 12:35

RE: Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug

wessie wrote:
> I'm busy implementing your first suggestion, but how would I 
> go about doing
> the second ("including a static
> util.js") ?

Put a copy of util.js in some directory and create a small and 
simple .html file beside it containing:
  <script src="util.js"></script>
  <... your base table markup ...>
  <button onclick="func();">Trigger bug</button>
  <script>
    function func() {
      ... your addRows calls etc ...
    }
  </script>

Best regards
Mike
wessie | 15 May 12:42

RE: Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug


Hi mikewse,

Thanks so much for the help. i'll try that now and get back with the result.
Thanks again! :-)

mikewse wrote:
> 
> wessie wrote:
>> I'm busy implementing your first suggestion, but how would I 
>> go about doing
>> the second ("including a static
>> util.js") ?
> 
> Put a copy of util.js in some directory and create a small and 
> simple .html file beside it containing:
>   <script src="util.js"></script>
>   <... your base table markup ...>
>   <button onclick="func();">Trigger bug</button>
>   <script>
>     function func() {
>       ... your addRows calls etc ...
>     }
>   </script>
> 
> Best regards
> Mike
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
> 
> 
> 

--

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Firefox-2.0.0.14-dwr-utils-bug-tp17247178p17250437.html
Sent from the DWR - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
wessie | 15 May 14:14

RE: Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug


Hi mikewse,

I tried what you suggested and the result is unfortunately the same. Any
other thoughts/suggestions/pearls of wisdom? 

I've paid abit more attention to what firebug has been producing on my
original page and i see that in the dynamic table there are 2 tbody tags (2
opening and 2 closing tags). At this stage my theory is that firefox is
correctly 'bugging out' but bug-riddled IE6 is blissfully unaware of this
problem and renders the table 'properly'.

Will scratch a little further but would appreciate any and all help.

mikewse wrote:
> 
> wessie wrote:
>> I'm busy implementing your first suggestion, but how would I 
>> go about doing
>> the second ("including a static
>> util.js") ?
> 
> Put a copy of util.js in some directory and create a small and 
> simple .html file beside it containing:
>   <script src="util.js"></script>
>   <... your base table markup ...>
>   <button onclick="func();">Trigger bug</button>
>   <script>
>     function func() {
>       ... your addRows calls etc ...
>     }
>   </script>
> 
> Best regards
> Mike
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
> 
> 
> 

--

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Firefox-2.0.0.14-dwr-utils-bug-tp17247178p17251864.html
Sent from the DWR - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Mike Wilson | 15 May 15:17

RE: Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug

You shouldn't have two tbody sections so I wouldn't try anything else
before that is resolved. If you want more help then you should post 
your generated HTML and the example reproducing the problem here on 
the list. 

Best regards
Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wessie [mailto:jordan.wesley@...] 
> Sent: den 15 maj 2008 14:15
> To: users@...
> Subject: RE: [dwr-user] Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug
> 
> 
> Hi mikewse,
> 
> I tried what you suggested and the result is unfortunately 
> the same. Any
> other thoughts/suggestions/pearls of wisdom? 
> 
> I've paid abit more attention to what firebug has been producing on my
> original page and i see that in the dynamic table there are 2 
> tbody tags (2
> opening and 2 closing tags). At this stage my theory is that 
> firefox is
> correctly 'bugging out' but bug-riddled IE6 is blissfully 
> unaware of this
> problem and renders the table 'properly'.
> 
> Will scratch a little further but would appreciate any and all help.
> 
> 
> mikewse wrote:
> > 
> > wessie wrote:
> >> I'm busy implementing your first suggestion, but how would I 
> >> go about doing
> >> the second ("including a static
> >> util.js") ?
> > 
> > Put a copy of util.js in some directory and create a small and 
> > simple .html file beside it containing:
> >   <script src="util.js"></script>
> >   <... your base table markup ...>
> >   <button onclick="func();">Trigger bug</button>
> >   <script>
> >     function func() {
> >       ... your addRows calls etc ...
> >     }
> >   </script>
> > 
> > Best regards
> > Mike
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Firefox-2.0.0.14-dwr-utils-bug-tp1724717
> 8p17251864.html
> Sent from the DWR - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
> 
wessie | 16 May 10:17

RE: Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug


Hi there mikewse,

I've followed your advice and removed the second tbody element from the
table but alas no luck.

So as suggested i've included a copy of the .html file.

Thanks again for all the help!!

wessie! http://www.nabble.com/file/p17269752/test.htm test.htm 

mikewse wrote:
> 
> You shouldn't have two tbody sections so I wouldn't try anything else
> before that is resolved. If you want more help then you should post 
> your generated HTML and the example reproducing the problem here on 
> the list. 
> 
> Best regards
> Mike
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: wessie [mailto:jordan.wesley@...] 
>> Sent: den 15 maj 2008 14:15
>> To: users@...
>> Subject: RE: [dwr-user] Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug
>> 
>> 
>> Hi mikewse,
>> 
>> I tried what you suggested and the result is unfortunately 
>> the same. Any
>> other thoughts/suggestions/pearls of wisdom? 
>> 
>> I've paid abit more attention to what firebug has been producing on my
>> original page and i see that in the dynamic table there are 2 
>> tbody tags (2
>> opening and 2 closing tags). At this stage my theory is that 
>> firefox is
>> correctly 'bugging out' but bug-riddled IE6 is blissfully 
>> unaware of this
>> problem and renders the table 'properly'.
>> 
>> Will scratch a little further but would appreciate any and all help.
>> 
>> 
>> mikewse wrote:
>> > 
>> > wessie wrote:
>> >> I'm busy implementing your first suggestion, but how would I 
>> >> go about doing
>> >> the second ("including a static
>> >> util.js") ?
>> > 
>> > Put a copy of util.js in some directory and create a small and 
>> > simple .html file beside it containing:
>> >   <script src="util.js"></script>
>> >   <... your base table markup ...>
>> >   <button onclick="func();">Trigger bug</button>
>> >   <script>
>> >     function func() {
>> >       ... your addRows calls etc ...
>> >     }
>> >   </script>
>> > 
>> > Best regards
>> > Mike
>> > 
>> > 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> 
>> -- 
>> View this message in context: 
>> http://www.nabble.com/Firefox-2.0.0.14-dwr-utils-bug-tp1724717
>> 8p17251864.html
>> Sent from the DWR - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
> 
> 
> 

--

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Firefox-2.0.0.14-dwr-utils-bug-tp17247178p17269752.html
Sent from the DWR - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Mike Wilson | 16 May 10:50

RE: Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug

In the file version I can download from Nabble there are still
external references in the file, and the Trigger button calls
a non-existing function. There is also a lot of JS code that I
can't judge if it is important for the issue reproduction.

With respect for the people helping you for free, to help you
with your paid job on this mailing list, please put effort into 
making a *minimal* and working example that reproduces your 
problem.
Also, if you are mailing through Nabble please consider 
inlining the HTML example instead of attaching.

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wessie [mailto:jordan.wesley@...] 
> Sent: den 16 maj 2008 10:18
> To: users@...
> Subject: RE: [dwr-user] Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug
> 
> 
> Hi there mikewse,
> 
> I've followed your advice and removed the second tbody 
> element from the
> table but alas no luck.
> 
> So as suggested i've included a copy of the .html file.
> 
> Thanks again for all the help!!
> 
> wessie! http://www.nabble.com/file/p17269752/test.htm test.htm 
> 
> 
> mikewse wrote:
> > 
> > You shouldn't have two tbody sections so I wouldn't try 
> anything else
> > before that is resolved. If you want more help then you should post 
> > your generated HTML and the example reproducing the problem here on 
> > the list. 
> > 
> > Best regards
> > Mike
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: wessie [mailto:jordan.wesley@...] 
> >> Sent: den 15 maj 2008 14:15
> >> To: users@...
> >> Subject: RE: [dwr-user] Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Hi mikewse,
> >> 
> >> I tried what you suggested and the result is unfortunately 
> >> the same. Any
> >> other thoughts/suggestions/pearls of wisdom? 
> >> 
> >> I've paid abit more attention to what firebug has been 
> producing on my
> >> original page and i see that in the dynamic table there are 2 
> >> tbody tags (2
> >> opening and 2 closing tags). At this stage my theory is that 
> >> firefox is
> >> correctly 'bugging out' but bug-riddled IE6 is blissfully 
> >> unaware of this
> >> problem and renders the table 'properly'.
> >> 
> >> Will scratch a little further but would appreciate any and 
> all help.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> mikewse wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > wessie wrote:
> >> >> I'm busy implementing your first suggestion, but how would I 
> >> >> go about doing
> >> >> the second ("including a static
> >> >> util.js") ?
> >> > 
> >> > Put a copy of util.js in some directory and create a small and 
> >> > simple .html file beside it containing:
> >> >   <script src="util.js"></script>
> >> >   <... your base table markup ...>
> >> >   <button onclick="func();">Trigger bug</button>
> >> >   <script>
> >> >     function func() {
> >> >       ... your addRows calls etc ...
> >> >     }
> >> >   </script>
> >> > 
> >> > Best regards
> >> > Mike
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> View this message in context: 
> >> http://www.nabble.com/Firefox-2.0.0.14-dwr-utils-bug-tp1724717
> >> 8p17251864.html
> >> Sent from the DWR - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Firefox-2.0.0.14-dwr-utils-bug-tp1724717
> 8p17269752.html
> Sent from the DWR - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
> 
wessie | 16 May 11:01

RE: Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug


Humblest apologies mikewse,

I attached the html file and then tested the link to see if the 'error' was
replicated and i still got the erroneous behaviour and assumed that others
were getting the same problem. I also assumed it would be better to upload
the file as opposed to sending the application. Sorry for that assumption as
well.

When i checked the uploaded html i noticed that despite not returning any
data from my ajax service (to be expected) in firefox the 'gap' still grew
every time i clicked on the image. I'll try to strip down the application
and send a working example asap!

sorry for the mistakes and thanks again mikewse.

mikewse wrote:
> 
> In the file version I can download from Nabble there are still
> external references in the file, and the Trigger button calls
> a non-existing function. There is also a lot of JS code that I
> can't judge if it is important for the issue reproduction.
> 
> With respect for the people helping you for free, to help you
> with your paid job on this mailing list, please put effort into 
> making a *minimal* and working example that reproduces your 
> problem.
> Also, if you are mailing through Nabble please consider 
> inlining the HTML example instead of attaching.
> 
> Mike
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: wessie [mailto:jordan.wesley@...] 
>> Sent: den 16 maj 2008 10:18
>> To: users@...
>> Subject: RE: [dwr-user] Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug
>> 
>> 
>> Hi there mikewse,
>> 
>> I've followed your advice and removed the second tbody 
>> element from the
>> table but alas no luck.
>> 
>> So as suggested i've included a copy of the .html file.
>> 
>> Thanks again for all the help!!
>> 
>> wessie! http://www.nabble.com/file/p17269752/test.htm test.htm 
>> 
>> 
>> mikewse wrote:
>> > 
>> > You shouldn't have two tbody sections so I wouldn't try 
>> anything else
>> > before that is resolved. If you want more help then you should post 
>> > your generated HTML and the example reproducing the problem here on 
>> > the list. 
>> > 
>> > Best regards
>> > Mike
>> > 
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: wessie [mailto:jordan.wesley@...] 
>> >> Sent: den 15 maj 2008 14:15
>> >> To: users@...
>> >> Subject: RE: [dwr-user] Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> Hi mikewse,
>> >> 
>> >> I tried what you suggested and the result is unfortunately 
>> >> the same. Any
>> >> other thoughts/suggestions/pearls of wisdom? 
>> >> 
>> >> I've paid abit more attention to what firebug has been 
>> producing on my
>> >> original page and i see that in the dynamic table there are 2 
>> >> tbody tags (2
>> >> opening and 2 closing tags). At this stage my theory is that 
>> >> firefox is
>> >> correctly 'bugging out' but bug-riddled IE6 is blissfully 
>> >> unaware of this
>> >> problem and renders the table 'properly'.
>> >> 
>> >> Will scratch a little further but would appreciate any and 
>> all help.
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> mikewse wrote:
>> >> > 
>> >> > wessie wrote:
>> >> >> I'm busy implementing your first suggestion, but how would I 
>> >> >> go about doing
>> >> >> the second ("including a static
>> >> >> util.js") ?
>> >> > 
>> >> > Put a copy of util.js in some directory and create a small and 
>> >> > simple .html file beside it containing:
>> >> >   <script src="util.js"></script>
>> >> >   <... your base table markup ...>
>> >> >   <button onclick="func();">Trigger bug</button>
>> >> >   <script>
>> >> >     function func() {
>> >> >       ... your addRows calls etc ...
>> >> >     }
>> >> >   </script>
>> >> > 
>> >> > Best regards
>> >> > Mike
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> > 
>> >> 
>> >> -- 
>> >> View this message in context: 
>> >> http://www.nabble.com/Firefox-2.0.0.14-dwr-utils-bug-tp1724717
>> >> 8p17251864.html
>> >> Sent from the DWR - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
>> >> 
>> > 
>> > 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> 
>> -- 
>> View this message in context: 
>> http://www.nabble.com/Firefox-2.0.0.14-dwr-utils-bug-tp1724717
>> 8p17269752.html
>> Sent from the DWR - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
> 
> 
> 

--

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Firefox-2.0.0.14-dwr-utils-bug-tp17247178p17270420.html
Sent from the DWR - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Mike Wilson | 16 May 13:33

RE: Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug

> I also assumed it would be better to upload
> the file as opposed to sending the application.

Oh, it's nice uploading the file but I am concerned about
having the code being discussed available in the mailing
list for a long time. Are Nabble uploads "eternal"? I was
assuming that they may remove them after some time.

> in firefox the 'gap' still grew
> every time i clicked on the image.

I should click on the (broken) image to trigger the bug, 
and not the button labeled "Trigger" ?!
That's not really making it evident for us :-/

I can see your problem now. I'll take a look.
Mike
wessie | 16 May 14:07

RE: Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug


Yes, sorry about that one mikewse,

I got so caught up with using your original suggestion and then copied my
code into the 'test' app and forgot about that button there %-|

Sorry making a few amateurish mistakes. 

Hey, thanks again for all the help!

mikewse wrote:
> 
>> I also assumed it would be better to upload
>> the file as opposed to sending the application.
> 
> Oh, it's nice uploading the file but I am concerned about
> having the code being discussed available in the mailing
> list for a long time. Are Nabble uploads "eternal"? I was
> assuming that they may remove them after some time.
> 
>> in firefox the 'gap' still grew
>> every time i clicked on the image.
> 
> I should click on the (broken) image to trigger the bug, 
> and not the button labeled "Trigger" ?!
> That's not really making it evident for us :-/
> 
> I can see your problem now. I'll take a look.
> Mike
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
> 
> 
> 

--

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Firefox-2.0.0.14-dwr-utils-bug-tp17247178p17273183.html
Sent from the DWR - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Mike Wilson | 16 May 13:43

RE: Firefox 2.0.0.14 dwr utils bug

> When i checked the uploaded html i noticed that despite not 
> returning any
> data from my ajax service (to be expected) in firefox the 
> 'gap' still grew
> every time i clicked on the image. 

You could also phrase that as despite not calling any DWR
util function the bug still remains.
I suggest you isolate your JavaScript<->Firefox bug in an
example without DWR and then ask for help in a new post titled
"layout problems when manipulating TABLE in Firefox", possibly
in a mailing list or forum specializing on JavaScript rendering
in browsers.

Mike

Gmane