23 Jan 2012 20:55
25 Jan 2012 21:25
Re: Due datefor 2.6.0
Oli Bye has been doing sterling work for RC2. It's accessible from Maven (God help us) now. What do you need? S. > Is there a due date for 2.6.0? > > Thanks in advance. > > -Julian > Steve Freeman Winner of the Agile Alliance Gordon Pask award 2006 Book: http://www.growing-object-oriented-software.com +44 797 179 4105 Twitter: <at> sf105 Higher Order Logic Limited Registered office. 2 Church Street, Burnham, Bucks, SL1 7HZ. Company registered in England & Wales. Number 7522677 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
26 Jan 2012 06:26
AW: Due datefor 2.6.0
Thanks for the reply, I don't need anything in particular. It just seemed(to me) that jmockwasn't being developed actively further( more rather a colleague tried to discourage me to use jmock because "it is no longer being developed". -Julian -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Steve Freeman [mailto:steve@...] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Januar 2012 21:26 An: user@... Betreff: Re: [jmock-user] Due datefor 2.6.0 Oli Bye has been doing sterling work for RC2. It's accessible from Maven (God help us) now. What do you need? S. > Is there a due date for 2.6.0? > > Thanks in advance. > > -Julian > Steve Freeman Winner of the Agile Alliance Gordon Pask award 2006 Book: http://www.growing-object-oriented-software.com +44 797 179 4105 Twitter: <at> sf105 Higher Order Logic Limited Registered office. 2 Church Street, Burnham, Bucks, SL1 7HZ. Company registered in England & Wales. Number 7522677 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
26 Jan 2012 09:17
Re: AW: Due datefor 2.6.0
That may also be because it does what we need it to within the limits of Java <= 6. There are (finally) some features in Java 7 that look like they're worthing taking advantage of, but we tend to be conservative about that sort of thing. One might argue that the other frameworks keep moving because they're still catching up on features ;) S. On 26 Jan 2012, at 05:26, Julian Bassett wrote: > Thanks for the reply, > I don't need anything in particular. It just seemed(to me) that jmockwasn't > being developed actively further( more rather a colleague tried to > discourage me to use jmock because "it is no longer being developed". Steve Freeman Winner of the Agile Alliance Gordon Pask award 2006 Book: http://www.growing-object-oriented-software.com +44 797 179 4105 Twitter: <at> sf105 Higher Order Logic Limited Registered office. 2 Church Street, Burnham, Bucks, SL1 7HZ. Company registered in England & Wales. Number 7522677 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
26 Jan 2012 09:47
Re: AW: Due datefor 2.6.0
That's good for me - but maybe some (many?) people are getting the wrong impression - especially when stalling on a release candidate - the date on the jmock-2.6.0-RC2.jar is 1st July 2010 - that is one and a half years ago.
thanks,
-Julian
Steve Freeman <steve-/6t1Ty3A97Vaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org> hat am 26. Januar 2012 um 09:17 geschrieben:
> That may also be because it does what we need it to within the limits of Java <= 6. There are (finally) some features in Java 7 that look like they're worthing taking advantage of, but we tend to be conservative about that sort of thing.
>
> One might argue that the other frameworks keep moving because they're still catching up on features ;)
>
> S.
>
> On 26 Jan 2012, at 05:26, Julian Bassett wrote:
> > Thanks for the reply,
> > I don't need anything in particular. It just seemed(to me) that jmockwasn't
> > being developed actively further( more rather a colleague tried to
> > discourage me to use jmock because "it is no longer being developed".
>
> Steve Freeman
>
> Winner of the Agile Alliance Gordon Pask award 2006
> Book: http://www.growing-object-oriented-software.com
>
> +44 797 179 4105
> Twitter: <at> sf105
> Higher Order Logic Limited
> Registered office. 2 Church Street, Burnham, Bucks, SL1 7HZ.
> Company registered in England & Wales. Number 7522677
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
26 Jan 2012 09:57
Re: AW: Due datefor 2.6.0
To tell you the truth, we hit the wall with java generics. But, yes we should just commit it and ship. S. On 26 Jan 2012, at 08:47, Julian Bassett wrote: > That's good for me - but maybe some (many?) people are getting the wrong impression - especially when stalling on a release candidate - the date on the jmock-2.6.0-RC2.jar is 1st July 2010 - that is one and a half years ago. Steve Freeman Winner of the Agile Alliance Gordon Pask award 2006 Book: http://www.growing-object-oriented-software.com +44 797 179 4105 Twitter: <at> sf105 Higher Order Logic Limited Registered office. 2 Church Street, Burnham, Bucks, SL1 7HZ. Company registered in England & Wales. Number 7522677 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
26 Jan 2012 09:18
Re: AW: Due datefor 2.6.0
but we have also been a bit rubbish about releasing what we have... On 26 Jan 2012, at 05:26, Julian Bassett wrote: > Thanks for the reply, > I don't need anything in particular. It just seemed(to me) that jmockwasn't > being developed actively further( more rather a colleague tried to > discourage me to use jmock because "it is no longer being developed". Steve Freeman Winner of the Agile Alliance Gordon Pask award 2006 Book: http://www.growing-object-oriented-software.com +44 797 179 4105 Twitter: <at> sf105 Higher Order Logic Limited Registered office. 2 Church Street, Burnham, Bucks, SL1 7HZ. Company registered in England & Wales. Number 7522677 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
RSS Feed