Mark Salter | 27 Nov 2009 14:34

Re: Addition of BaseChannel.send(byte[])

Chhil wrote:
> Hello Marc,
> 
> Does this basically mean avoiding the packing and unpacking of  
> messages to allow creating of messages by means other than packagers?
It gives a way of sending things as well as ISOMsgs.

For example I wanted to provide a hexdump to a user connected via a
telnetxmlchannel and could see no nice way of achieving this...

--

-- 
Mark

------------------------------------

Alejandro Revilla | 27 Nov 2009 14:40
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: Addition of BaseChannel.send(byte[])

I  understand. Nice use case. I think you can go ahead and add your change,
then we could create a branch to play with the major change and see how it
goes, without affecting trunk, and then merge back.

On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Mark Salter <marksalter@...>wrote:

> Chhil wrote:
> > Hello Marc,
> >
> > Does this basically mean avoiding the packing and unpacking of
> > messages to allow creating of messages by means other than packagers?
> It gives a way of sending things as well as ISOMsgs.
>
> For example I wanted to provide a hexdump to a user connected via a
> telnetxmlchannel and could see no nice way of achieving this...
>
> --
> Mark
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Mark Salter | 27 Nov 2009 14:48

Re: Addition of BaseChannel.send(byte[])

Alejandro Revilla wrote:
> I  understand. Nice use case.
Thanks.

> I think you can go ahead and add your change,
> then we could create a branch to play with the major change and see how it
> goes, without affecting trunk, and then merge back.

Committed r2822.

--

-- 
Mark

------------------------------------

Alejandro Revilla | 27 Nov 2009 15:21
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: Addition of BaseChannel.send(byte[])

Great!

On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Mark Salter <marksalter@...>wrote:

> Alejandro Revilla wrote:
> > I  understand. Nice use case.
> Thanks.
>
> > I think you can go ahead and add your change,
> > then we could create a branch to play with the major change and see how
> it
> > goes, without affecting trunk, and then merge back.
>
> Committed r2822.
>
>
> --
> Mark
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

(Continue reading)

Chhil | 27 Nov 2009 17:26
Picon

Re: Addition of BaseChannel.send(byte[])

Thank you for the example.

-murtuza

On Nov 27, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Mark Salter <marksalter@...>  
wrote:

> Chhil wrote:
> > Hello Marc,
> >
> > Does this basically mean avoiding the packing and unpacking of
> > messages to allow creating of messages by means other than  
> packagers?
> It gives a way of sending things as well as ISOMsgs.
>
> For example I wanted to provide a hexdump to a user connected via a
> telnetxmlchannel and could see no nice way of achieving this...
>
> -- 
> Mark
> 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------


Gmane