On Thursday 17 January 2008 19:22:42 Allen Winter wrote: > Just make sure we have some wiggle-room.  We might have to extend a month > or two.. we really don't know the Qt 4.4.x schedule, etc.

On Thursday 17 January 2008 13:22:45 Cornelius Schumacher wrote: > On Thursday 17 January 2008 01:14, Sebastian Kuegler wrote: > > I therefore propose to adopt a 6 months release schedule, starting to > > release in July with 4.1, then in January 2009 4.2, and so on. > > Given the fuzz which was made around this topic when Mark Shuttleworth > asked us to do it, how do you intent to communicate it?

> On Thursday 17 January 2008 01:14, Sebastian Kuegler wrote: > > I therefore propose to adopt a 6 months release schedule, starting to > > release in July with 4.1, then in January 2009 4.2, and so on. > > Given the fuzz which was made around this topic when Mark Shuttleworth > asked us to do it, how do you intent to communicate it?

On Thursday 17 January 2008 05:38:29 Matt Rogers wrote: > I object, actually. Considering the current release schedules of the > various distros, I actually think a release in August or September would > be better for KDE 4.1.

On Thursday 17 January 2008 05:38:29 Matt Rogers wrote: > I'm in the process of coming up with a schedule with a release in late > August, which should give us enough wiggle room to push it into > September if needed. It should be done in enough time so that it can be > somewhat discussed before Aaron's keynote on Friday. ;)

> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:14:28AM +0100, Sebastian Kuegler wrote: > > So I went through the recent emails regarding the release schedule. Since > > the discussion has fallen silent, I think pretty much everything has been > > said. My impression from re-reading all those emails is that most people > > would like to adopt a 6 months schedule, and that July would be a good > > time for 4.1. > > > > I therefore propose to adopt a 6 months release schedule, starting to > > release in July with 4.1, then in January 2009 4.2, and so on. > > > > Now it'd be time for people with *strong* objections to give them, > > otherwise, we should start communicating the new schedule. > > > > If you decide to object, please come up with a counter-proposal as to not > > block KDE from moving on. If the proposal gets accepted, I'm happy to > > work out details, based on the discussion following Matt's proposal and > > Kevin's insights. > > -- > > I object, actually. Considering the current release schedules of the > various distros, I actually think a release in August or September would > be better for KDE 4.1. >

On Thursday 17 January 2008 01:27:48 Richard Moore wrote: > On 1/17/08, Sebastian Kuegler <sebas@...> wrote: > > Now it'd be time for people with *strong* objections to give them, > > otherwise, we should start communicating the new schedule. > > Not an objection, but we need to consider that a number of things in > plasma are going to need Qt 4.4 to meet their objectives for 4.1. We > need to ensure there's a big enough gap to fix any issues discovered > in the new Qt release before we freeze things. Can anyone from TT > comment on when we're likely to see 4.4 released?