8 Feb 02:05
8 Feb 08:46
Re: Image requests with A4D and 4Dv13
> Am I wasting my time testing the current version of Active4D with 4D v13 ? > > It mostly works but there seems to be a problem with image requests. I wasn't able to get it to work at all. I will be doing full testing with v13 once I finish up a bunch of changes in the current version. Regards, Aparajita www.aparajitaworld.com "If you dare to fail, you are bound to succeed." - Sri Chinmoy | www.srichinmoy.org
8 Feb 14:14
Re: A4D and 4Dv13
Same here, minimal testing, but only the text of the Active4D pages were served, code not executed at all. But like I said, didn't mess much with config's, just wanted to see if it would just 'work'. MV -----Original Message----- From: active4d-dev-bounces@... [mailto:active4d-dev-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Aparajita Fishman Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 2:46 AM To: Active4D Developer Discussion List Subject: Re: [Active4d-dev] Image requests with A4D and 4Dv13 > Am I wasting my time testing the current version of Active4D with 4D v13 ? > > It mostly works but there seems to be a problem with image requests. I wasn't able to get it to work at all. I will be doing full testing with v13 once I finish up a bunch of changes in the current version. Regards, Aparajita www.aparajitaworld.com "If you dare to fail, you are bound to succeed." - Sri Chinmoy | www.srichinmoy.org _______________________________________________ Active4D-dev mailing list(Continue reading)
8 Feb 14:37
Re: A4D and 4Dv13
On 8 Feb 2012, at 14:14, Mike Vogt wrote: > Same here, minimal testing, but only the text of the Active4D pages were served, code not executed at all I think mine must have had code executing. It's a very complex fusebox site and everything just worked reasonably well except for static images and possibly sessions. Peter
8 Feb 15:21
Re: A4D and 4Dv13
Peter, Any noticeable improvement in serving performance due to the new web server? MV -----Original Message----- From: active4d-dev-bounces@... [mailto:active4d-dev-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Peter Jakobsson Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 8:38 AM To: Active4D Developer Discussion List Subject: Re: [Active4d-dev] A4D and 4Dv13 On 8 Feb 2012, at 14:14, Mike Vogt wrote: > Same here, minimal testing, but only the text of the Active4D pages were served, code not executed at all I think mine must have had code executing. It's a very complex fusebox site and everything just worked reasonably well except for static images and possibly sessions. Peter _______________________________________________ Active4D-dev mailing list Active4D-dev@... http://list.aparajitaworld.com/listinfo/active4d-dev Archives: http://vasudev.aparajitaworld.com/archive/active4d-dev/ ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com(Continue reading)
8 Feb 15:50
Re: A4D and 4Dv13
On 8 Feb 2012, at 15:21, Mike Vogt wrote: > Any noticeable improvement in serving performance due to the new web server? On a totally non-scientific basis yes, (I think). It kind of feels 'jerkier' but faster. I plan to test it properly with a stress tester to see if there's a capacity improvement. I didn't really expect much improvement because all my pages are so dynamic. On the other hand the shell level code uses SEND HTML BLOB and if this command uses multiple cores then maybe there's some benefit. Peter
8 Feb 21:22
Re: A4D and 4Dv13
>> Same here, minimal testing, but only the text of the Active4D pages were served, code not executed at all > > I think mine must have had code executing. It's a very complex fusebox site and everything just worked reasonably well except for static images and possibly sessions. Thank you 4D for totally messing us up. Regards, Aparajita
10 Feb 05:34
Re: A4D and 4Dv13
Hi, Is this the same for using NTK as a web engine? I suppose not... Greetings, Peter ----- Original Message ----- From: Aparajita Fishman [mailto:aparajita@...] To: Active4D Developer Discussion List [mailto:active4d-dev@...] Sent: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:22:06 +0100 Subject: Re: [Active4d-dev] A4D and 4Dv13 > >> Same here, minimal testing, but only the text of the Active4D pages were > served, code not executed at all > > > > I think mine must have had code executing. It's a very complex fusebox > site and everything just worked reasonably well except for static images and > possibly sessions. > > Thank you 4D for totally messing us up. > > Regards, > > Aparajita > > _______________________________________________(Continue reading)
RSS Feed