Re: <at> property

On 08/07/2012 10:52 PM, José Armando García Sancio wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Timon Gehr<timon.gehr <at> gmx.ch>  wrote:
>> On 08/07/2012 08:37 PM, José Armando García Sancio wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Timon Gehr<timon.gehr <at> gmx.ch>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 08/07/2012 07:59 AM, José Armando García Sancio wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Kapps<opantm2+spam <at> gmail.com>    wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sunday, 5 August 2012 at 14:32:50 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sunday, 5 August 2012 at 04:12:23 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'd be very surprised if all that many people compile with -property.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Indeed. Sometimes I try it just to see what happens, and always the
>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>> results: it doesn't solve problems and complains about code.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some examples of things that break: