15 Aug 21:08
Re: any performance benchmark comparisions for text processing between Erlang & Perl
From: Matt Williamson <dawsdesign <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: any performance benchmark comparisions for text processing between Erlang & Perl
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general
Date: 2008-08-15 19:08:19 GMT
Subject: Re: any performance benchmark comparisions for text processing between Erlang & Perl
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.erlang.general
Date: 2008-08-15 19:08:19 GMT
I hear it sucks. See http://www.erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2006-August/022596.html for a port driver version which might at least approach Perl's.
2008/8/15 Eric Ho <drwho102003-erlang <at> yahoo.com>
_______________________________________________
So how does its regexp's performance as compared to Perl's ?
-eric
--- On Thu, 8/14/08, Richard A. O'Keefe <ok <at> cs.otago.ac.nz> wrote:From: Richard A. O'Keefe <ok <at> cs.otago.ac.nz>
Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] any performance benchmark comparisions for text processing between Erlang & Perl ?
To: drwho102003-erlang <at> yahoo.com
Cc: erlang-questions <at> erlang.org
Date: Thursday, August 14, 2008, 11:04 PM
On 15 Aug 2008, at 7:04 am, Eric Ho wrote:
> Just curious.
Since Perl *was* designed to be a text processing language,
and Erlang *wasn't*, it's not clear that any benchmarks
that have been done tell us much except where the effort
needs to go to make it better.
For example, R12B-3 includes the prototype regular
expression implementation based on PCRE from
http://www.erlang.org/eeps/eep-0011.html
erlang-questions mailing list
erlang-questions <at> erlang.org
http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
<div><div dir="ltr">I hear it sucks. See <a href="http://www.erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2006-August/022596.html" target="_blank">http://www.erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2006-August/022596.html</a> for a port driver version which might at least approach Perl's.<br><div class="gmail_quote"> <div dir="ltr"> <br><div class="gmail_quote">2008/8/15 Eric Ho <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:drwho102003-erlang <at> yahoo.com" target="_blank">drwho102003-erlang <at> yahoo.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote"> <div> <div></div> <div class="Wj3C7c"> <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td valign="top"> So how does its regexp's performance as compared to Perl's ?<br><br><br>-eric<br><br>--- On Thu, 8/14/08, Richard A. O'Keefe <<a href="mailto:ok <at> cs.otago.ac.nz" target="_blank">ok <at> cs.otago.ac.nz</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote>From: Richard A. O'Keefe <<a href="mailto:ok <at> cs.otago.ac.nz" target="_blank">ok <at> cs.otago.ac.nz</a>><br>Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] any performance benchmark comparisions for text processing between Erlang & Perl ?<br> To: <a href="mailto:drwho102003-erlang <at> yahoo.com" target="_blank">drwho102003-erlang <at> yahoo.com</a><br>Cc: <a href="mailto:erlang-questions <at> erlang.org" target="_blank">erlang-questions <at> erlang.org</a><br>Date: Thursday, August 14, 2008, 11:04 PM<br><br>On 15 Aug 2008, at 7:04 am, Eric Ho wrote:<br><br>> Just curious.<br><br>Since Perl *was* designed to be a text processing language,<br>and Erlang *wasn't*, it's not clear that any benchmarks<br>that have been done tell us much except where the effort<br> needs to go to make it better.<br><br>For example, R12B-3 includes the prototype regular<br>expression implementation based on PCRE from<br><a href="http://www.erlang.org/eeps/eep-0011.html" target="_blank">http://www.erlang.org/eeps/eep-0011.html</a><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> </blockquote> </td></tr></table> <br> </div> </div>_______________________________________________<br> erlang-questions mailing list<br><a href="mailto:erlang-questions <at> erlang.org" target="_blank">erlang-questions <at> erlang.org</a><br><a href="http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions" target="_blank">http://www.erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions</a><br> </blockquote> </div> <br> </div> </div> <br> </div></div>
RSS Feed