Fwd: final Groovy JSR?

Wasn't delivered.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bill Shannon <bill.shannon@...>
Date: Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: final Groovy JSR?
To: Guillaume Laforge <glaforge@...>
Cc: jsr-241-comments@..., Groovy JSR <jsr@...>

Guillaume Laforge wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Bill Shannon <bill.shannon@...> wrote:
>
> > [...]
> >  You need a spec that's sufficient for someone else to implement
> >  Groovy support without reference to your code.  I don't know that
> >  much about Groovy, but you might want to split the spec into a
> >  language/compiler portion and a runtime portion (assuming runtime
> >  support beyond what's in Java SE is needed).
> >
>
> What do you mean by language/compiler portion, and runtime portion exactly?
> I just want to be sure I understood correctly.
> For the language part, we need to explain the semantics of the
> language, its grammar, etc.
> For the runtime part, you mean things like the libraries? ie. a
> closure class, a GString class, etc.
> Is that what you meant?
>