Matthew Farkas-Dyck | 9 Jul 14:29 2011
Picon

Re: Profile: zero total time

Yes -- I just tried it threaded, and the profile is true.

Thanks for your help.

Might this warrant another ticket?

On 8 July 2011 16:27, David Peixotto <dmp <at> rice.edu> wrote:
> Does it make a difference if you use the threaded vs. non-threaded runtime? I'm seeing the odd behavior on
Mac, but only for the single-threaed runtime.
>
> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5282#comment:8
>
> On Jul 7, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Matthew Farkas-Dyck wrote:
>
>> Sorry, I ought to have mentioned:
>>
>> $ uname -sr
>> Linux 2.6.38
>>
>> On 7 July 2011 14:03, Daniel Fischer <daniel.is.fischer <at> googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thursday 07 July 2011, 20:44:57, Matthew Farkas-Dyck wrote:
>>>> I am trying to take a profile of a program, but when I run it, the
>>>> total time (as given in the profiling report file) is zero!
>>>
>>> If you're on a Mac, it could be
>>>
>>> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5282
>>>
>>
>>
(Continue reading)

Simon Marlow | 11 Jul 14:38 2011
Picon

Re: Profile: zero total time

On 09/07/2011 13:29, Matthew Farkas-Dyck wrote:
> Yes -- I just tried it threaded, and the profile is true.
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Might this warrant another ticket?

Please add to the existing ticket:

   http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5282

if it is reproducible on Linux, there's a much greater chance I'll be 
able to fix it.

Cheers,
	Simon

> On 8 July 2011 16:27, David Peixotto<dmp <at> rice.edu>  wrote:
>> Does it make a difference if you use the threaded vs. non-threaded runtime? I'm seeing the odd behavior on
Mac, but only for the single-threaed runtime.
>>
>> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/5282#comment:8
>>
>> On Jul 7, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Matthew Farkas-Dyck wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, I ought to have mentioned:
>>>
>>> $ uname -sr
>>> Linux 2.6.38
>>>
(Continue reading)


Gmane