Rutger Vos | 2 Mar 09:53 2006
Picon
Picon

Bio::Tools::Run::* extending

Hi all,

I'd like to write some more Bio::Tools::Run::* wrappers, so I'm 
wondering what the canonical approach is. Which libraries *should* I 
look at (as examples of the bioperl received wisdom and coding 
standards) and which ones *shouldn't* I look at? I'm thinking that paup, 
mrbayes and modeltest need wrappers.

Thanks!

Rutger

--

-- 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Rutger Vos, PhD. candidate
Department of Biological Sciences
Simon Fraser University
8888 University Drive
Burnaby, BC, V5A1S6
Phone: 604-291-5625 
Fax: 604-291-3496
Personal site: http://www.sfu.ca/~rvosa
FAB* lab: http://www.sfu.ca/~fabstar
Bio::Phylo: http://search.cpan.org/~rvosa/Bio-Phylo/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Fields | 2 Mar 13:38 2006
Picon

Re: Bio::Tools::Run::* extending

Look at bioperl-run:

http://www.bioperl.org/wiki/Run_package

You can look over these modules for ideas, hints, etc.

Chris

On Mar 2, 2006, at 2:53 AM, Rutger Vos wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to write some more Bio::Tools::Run::* wrappers, so I'm
> wondering what the canonical approach is. Which libraries *should* I
> look at (as examples of the bioperl received wisdom and coding
> standards) and which ones *shouldn't* I look at? I'm thinking that  
> paup,
> mrbayes and modeltest need wrappers.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Rutger
>
> -- 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Rutger Vos, PhD. candidate
> Department of Biological Sciences
> Simon Fraser University
> 8888 University Drive
> Burnaby, BC, V5A1S6
(Continue reading)

Brian Osborne | 2 Mar 15:27 2006
Picon

Re: Bio::Tools::Run::* extending

Rutger,

For canonical approaches I'd start by looking at modules that Jason's
written, Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::Molphy::ProtML for example, but not limited
to that example since there's plenty of variation possible.

Brian O.

On 3/2/06 3:53 AM, "Rutger Vos" <rvosa <at> sfu.ca> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I'd like to write some more Bio::Tools::Run::* wrappers, so I'm
> wondering what the canonical approach is. Which libraries *should* I
> look at (as examples of the bioperl received wisdom and coding
> standards) and which ones *shouldn't* I look at? I'm thinking that paup,
> mrbayes and modeltest need wrappers.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Rutger

Gmane