Jason Stajich | 1 Sep 09:42

Re: Bio::Tools::dpAlign feature request

Safe to ignore the tests.  Those that are failing aren't even test for  
Bio::Align::dpAlign - but were written to test a bug that has not been  
fixed in the EVD module if I remember correctly that is why they are  
marked in a TODO block, but I can't tell if the Test.pm is actually  
skipping these tests or not.

I think we probably need to deprecate some of these modules as there  
is no maintainer of Ewan's code in here.

At a minimum we need to modularlize the tests for these modules into  
separate t dir and fix the need for multiple Makefile.PL in here and  
probably move to Build.PL

-jason
On Aug 28, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Yee Man Chan wrote:

>
> Hi Alexie
>
> My understanding is that you can ignore these failures.
>
> I believe test cases 17-20 were added by Jason Stajich before I  
> added the feature you requested. I am not sure what he was doing  
> there.
>
> I suppose he can give you the definite answer to whether this is  
> something important or not.
>
> By the way, did you try out the new feature? Does it work?
>
(Continue reading)

Chris Fields | 1 Sep 19:49
Gravatar

Re: Bio::Tools::dpAlign feature request

On pSW: I agree, I don't think it is worth maintaining it considering  
there are actively supported C/C++-based toolkits with similar  
functionality (SeqAn) and Petr's BioLib initiative will likely be a  
more maintainable effort.

chris

On Sep 1, 2008, at 2:42 AM, Jason Stajich wrote:

> Safe to ignore the tests.  Those that are failing aren't even test  
> for Bio::Align::dpAlign - but were written to test a bug that has  
> not been fixed in the EVD module if I remember correctly that is why  
> they are marked in a TODO block, but I can't tell if the Test.pm is  
> actually skipping these tests or not.
>
> I think we probably need to deprecate some of these modules as there  
> is no maintainer of Ewan's code in here.
>
> At a minimum we need to modularlize the tests for these modules into  
> separate t dir and fix the need for multiple Makefile.PL in here and  
> probably move to Build.PL
>
> -jason
> On Aug 28, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Yee Man Chan wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Alexie
>>
>> My understanding is that you can ignore these failures.
>>
(Continue reading)


Gmane