Re: What's up with line 248 of Bio::Coordinate::Pair?

Quilty. So I removed the line.

George, please do not try to piss us off. You can get all the attention you 
want from us. :)

What are you planning to do to Bio::Coordinate classes?

   -Heikki

On Thursday 04 September 2008 06:40:38 Jason Stajich wrote:
> Agreed - I don't know if that was something was changed mid-stream,
> but removing it should cause no pain...
> -j
>
> On Sep 3, 2008, at 6:29 PM, Chris Fields wrote:
> > Well, it doesn't look like the SplitLocation is even used, so I
> > think it is safe to remove.
> >
> > chris
> >
> > On Sep 3, 2008, at 6:19 PM, George Hartzell wrote:
> >> Ok, confess.  None of you know what's up with line 248 of
> >> Bio::Coordinate::Pair, do you?  You probably don't even know what's
> >> *on* that line.  Wonder how many will go look.
> >>
> >> Now that I either have your attention or have pissed you off (or
> >> both...), I think that creating a new Bio::Location::Split object in
> >> Bio::Coordinate::Pair::map() is a leftover or something, but I'm not
> >> quite sure enough to excise it and commit the change.
> >>