David Pollak | 11 Feb 23:02
Gravatar

Re: Re: [ANN] Scala 2.7.0-RC1

Ooohhh... this sounds wicked cool.  I'd love to hear "yes it works" and 
then see an example.

Judson, Ross wrote:
> Do implicits work with the annotated types? This can yield some nice
> benefits, like automatically doing a security check on a session object
> if the callee declares a @SecurityChecked annotation on the parameter.
> Having an extra "dimension" of type information will find many uses.
>
> RJ 
>   

Viktor Klang | 11 Feb 23:44
Picon

Re: Re: [ANN] Scala 2.7.0-RC1



On Feb 11, 2008 11:02 PM, David Pollak <dpp <at> athena.com> wrote:
Ooohhh... this sounds wicked cool.  I'd love to hear "yes it works" and
then see an example.

+x!
 


Judson, Ross wrote:
> Do implicits work with the annotated types? This can yield some nice
> benefits, like automatically doing a security check on a session object
> if the callee declares a <at> SecurityChecked annotation on the parameter.
> Having an extra "dimension" of type information will find many uses.
>
> RJ
>




--
_____________________________________
/                                                                 \
       /lift/ committer (www.liftweb.net)
     SGS member (Scala Group Sweden)
 SEJUG member (Swedish Java User Group)
\_____________________________________/

Gmane