Ralph Boland | 1 Nov 2009 04:30
Picon

Re: call for helping me sorting out what to integrate :)

>
> Hi guys
>
> It would help me to know the pending bugs that you fixed and that we
> should integrate.
> Of course everything should be on the bugtracker but I would like to
> know for example
> when there is a consensus for the hash implementation when it is ready
> to go in 1.1.
>
> In the meantime I will go over the bugtracker and pick up what is
> available (ie tagged 1.1 and fixed).
> It is important that we tag systematically the issues that will be
> integrated in 1.1 as 1.1 so that after
> we can follow. Some of the old entries integrated in 1.0 are not
> tagged 1.0 and may be we should script
> the bugtracker.

I assume that it is planned to add some version of my/Levente's
FasterSets code to Phare 1.1.
If so, then then it may be confusing to make the FasterSets code and
any hashedCollections code at the same time.
I thus suggest that a final decision on  FasterSets be made and get
the changes done so any changes to hashedCollections can be done
on top of  FasterSets rather than in parallel.

Regards,

Ralph Boland

(Continue reading)

Stéphane Ducasse | 1 Nov 2009 09:34
Picon
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: call for helping me sorting out what to integrate :)

Ok I will let martin and andres
have a look because I'm not enough expert in that.

On Nov 1, 2009, at 4:30 AM, Ralph Boland wrote:

>>
>> Hi guys
>>
>> It would help me to know the pending bugs that you fixed and that we
>> should integrate.
>> Of course everything should be on the bugtracker but I would like to
>> know for example
>> when there is a consensus for the hash implementation when it is  
>> ready
>> to go in 1.1.
>>
>> In the meantime I will go over the bugtracker and pick up what is
>> available (ie tagged 1.1 and fixed).
>> It is important that we tag systematically the issues that will be
>> integrated in 1.1 as 1.1 so that after
>> we can follow. Some of the old entries integrated in 1.0 are not
>> tagged 1.0 and may be we should script
>> the bugtracker.
>
> I assume that it is planned to add some version of my/Levente's
> FasterSets code to Phare 1.1.
> If so, then then it may be confusing to make the FasterSets code and
> any hashedCollections code at the same time.
> I thus suggest that a final decision on  FasterSets be made and get
> the changes done so any changes to hashedCollections can be done
(Continue reading)

Stéphane Ducasse | 1 Nov 2009 09:34
Picon
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: call for helping me sorting out what to integrate :)

Ok I will let martin and andres
have a look because I'm not enough expert in that.

On Nov 1, 2009, at 4:30 AM, Ralph Boland wrote:

>>
>> Hi guys
>>
>> It would help me to know the pending bugs that you fixed and that we
>> should integrate.
>> Of course everything should be on the bugtracker but I would like to
>> know for example
>> when there is a consensus for the hash implementation when it is  
>> ready
>> to go in 1.1.
>>
>> In the meantime I will go over the bugtracker and pick up what is
>> available (ie tagged 1.1 and fixed).
>> It is important that we tag systematically the issues that will be
>> integrated in 1.1 as 1.1 so that after
>> we can follow. Some of the old entries integrated in 1.0 are not
>> tagged 1.0 and may be we should script
>> the bugtracker.
>
> I assume that it is planned to add some version of my/Levente's
> FasterSets code to Phare 1.1.
> If so, then then it may be confusing to make the FasterSets code and
> any hashedCollections code at the same time.
> I thus suggest that a final decision on  FasterSets be made and get
> the changes done so any changes to hashedCollections can be done
(Continue reading)


Gmane