Ties Stuij | 14 Jul 11:23

squeak plugin in ff 2/3

Hey,

I'm trying to get Epaati to work in the browser, on the XO eventually,
and I'm running into two problems:

- In ff3 beta 5 on Linux (Ubuntu 8.04) I can't seem to get ff to
recognise the squeak plugin. Has anybody got experience with ff3 and
the plugin, good or bad?
My setup mirrors the requirements for a ff2 plugin configuration. When
running npsqueakrun squeak will launch a session. I tested both the
npsqueak.so from a pretty new sugar-jbuild as well as a version which
works with ff2 (I know there were problems with the standard squeak
plugin from squeakland not registering with ff properly (which last
time I checked (about 3 weeks/a month ago) still was the plugin
available for download. Should perhaps be updated?)).

- In ff2 I can load our activities from a server, but only if the .pr
file isn't to big. If it is of moderate size or more, I'm getting
space-low warnings followed by a crash on project load. Would anybody
happen to know why this is happening? Is there perhaps some memory
variable that's easily adjustable?

Thanks,
/Ties

Ties Stuij | 15 Jul 13:40

Re: squeak plugin in ff 2/3

To answer my own questions,
first of all, running the squeak installer puts the plugin in
/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins, which doesn't get picked up, on my setup in
any case. putting the plugin in tilde/.mozilla/plugins does register
with ff3. As for the space low message, this is fixed by adjusting
(taking away) the -mmap startup option in npsqueakrun.

/Ties

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Ties Stuij <cjstuij <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm trying to get Epaati to work in the browser, on the XO eventually,
> and I'm running into two problems:
>
> - In ff3 beta 5 on Linux (Ubuntu 8.04) I can't seem to get ff to
> recognise the squeak plugin. Has anybody got experience with ff3 and
> the plugin, good or bad?
> My setup mirrors the requirements for a ff2 plugin configuration. When
> running npsqueakrun squeak will launch a session. I tested both the
> npsqueak.so from a pretty new sugar-jbuild as well as a version which
> works with ff2 (I know there were problems with the standard squeak
> plugin from squeakland not registering with ff properly (which last
> time I checked (about 3 weeks/a month ago) still was the plugin
> available for download. Should perhaps be updated?)).
>
> - In ff2 I can load our activities from a server, but only if the .pr
> file isn't to big. If it is of moderate size or more, I'm getting
> space-low warnings followed by a crash on project load. Would anybody
> happen to know why this is happening? Is there perhaps some memory
(Continue reading)

Bert Freudenberg | 15 Jul 21:38

Re: Re: squeak plugin in ff 2/3

Does Ubuntu have a designated location for browser plugins?

- Bert -

Am 15.07.2008 um 04:40 schrieb Ties Stuij:

> To answer my own questions,
> first of all, running the squeak installer puts the plugin in
> /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins, which doesn't get picked up, on my setup in
> any case. putting the plugin in tilde/.mozilla/plugins does register
> with ff3. As for the space low message, this is fixed by adjusting
> (taking away) the -mmap startup option in npsqueakrun.
>
> /Ties
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Ties Stuij <cjstuij <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> I'm trying to get Epaati to work in the browser, on the XO  
>> eventually,
>> and I'm running into two problems:
>>
>> - In ff3 beta 5 on Linux (Ubuntu 8.04) I can't seem to get ff to
>> recognise the squeak plugin. Has anybody got experience with ff3 and
>> the plugin, good or bad?
>> My setup mirrors the requirements for a ff2 plugin configuration.  
>> When
>> running npsqueakrun squeak will launch a session. I tested both the
>> npsqueak.so from a pretty new sugar-jbuild as well as a version which
>> works with ff2 (I know there were problems with the standard squeak
(Continue reading)

Ties Stuij | 16 Jul 08:36

Re: Re: squeak plugin in ff 2/3

On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Bert Freudenberg <bert <at> freudenbergs.de> wrote:
> Does Ubuntu have a designated location for browser plugins?

As I understand ff2 plugins should go into /usr/lib/firefox/plugins/
and ff3 plugins should go into /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins.

/Ties

K. K. Subramaniam | 16 Jul 07:22

Re: Re: squeak plugin in ff 2/3

On Wednesday 16 Jul 2008 1:08:03 am Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> Does Ubuntu have a designated location for browser plugins?

The convention is to put files like plugins in /usr/lib/≤app>/plugins/. But 
that is just that - a convention and that can change with time and across 
distros. 64-bit systems use /usr/lib64/≤app>/plugins. Upstream installers 
like npsqueakregister should take in a list of paths for placing links to 
squeak plugin. This allows distro packagers or sysadmins to override them 
(with say /opt/≤app>/plugins) without having to patch scripts.

I can make a patch for npsqueakregister if there is any interest.

If no path list is given, 
globbing /usr/{local/lib,lib}/{firefox,mozilla,netscape}/plugins is a safe 
bet.

Subbu

Bert Freudenberg | 28 Jul 14:17

Re: Re: squeak plugin in ff 2/3


Am 15.07.2008 um 22:22 schrieb K. K. Subramaniam:

> On Wednesday 16 Jul 2008 1:08:03 am Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>> Does Ubuntu have a designated location for browser plugins?
>
> The convention is to put files like plugins in /usr/lib/≤app>/ 
> plugins/. But
> that is just that - a convention and that can change with time and  
> across
> distros. 64-bit systems use /usr/lib64/≤app>/plugins. Upstream  
> installers
> like npsqueakregister should take in a list of paths for placing  
> links to
> squeak plugin. This allows distro packagers or sysadmins to override  
> them
> (with say /opt/≤app>/plugins) without having to patch scripts.
>
> I can make a patch for npsqueakregister if there is any interest.
>
> If no path list is given,
> globbing /usr/{local/lib,lib}/{firefox,mozilla,netscape}/plugins is  
> a safe
> bet.
>
> Subbu

Did I ever answer this? Sure, send the patch.

- Bert -
(Continue reading)

John Thornborrow | 28 Jul 15:24

Re: Re: squeak plugin in ff 2/3

fyi, on Gentoo the plugins dir is /usr/lib/nsbrowser/plugins :)

John.

Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
> Am 15.07.2008 um 22:22 schrieb K. K. Subramaniam:
>
>> On Wednesday 16 Jul 2008 1:08:03 am Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>> Does Ubuntu have a designated location for browser plugins?
>>
>> The convention is to put files like plugins in 
>> /usr/lib/≤app>/plugins/. But
>> that is just that - a convention and that can change with time and 
>> across
>> distros. 64-bit systems use /usr/lib64/≤app>/plugins. Upstream 
>> installers
>> like npsqueakregister should take in a list of paths for placing 
>> links to
>> squeak plugin. This allows distro packagers or sysadmins to override 
>> them
>> (with say /opt/≤app>/plugins) without having to patch scripts.
>>
>> I can make a patch for npsqueakregister if there is any interest.
>>
>> If no path list is given,
>> globbing /usr/{local/lib,lib}/{firefox,mozilla,netscape}/plugins is a 
>> safe
>> bet.
>>
(Continue reading)


Gmane