Permalink | Reply |
headers
Thorsten Ottosen | 25 Nov 22:54

Re: Review Wizard Report for November 2008

Ronald Garcia skrev:

> Boost.Range (Update)
> --------------------
> :Author: Neil Groves
> 
> :Review Manager: Needed

I can be review manager here, if nobody else wants to do it.

-Thorsten
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Johan Råde | 26 Nov 10:18
Favicon

Re: Review Wizard Report for November 2008

Ronald Garcia wrote:
 >
 > A few libraries have been reviewed and accepted into boost, but have
 > not yet appeared in SVN as far as I can tell.  Could some light be
 > shed on the status of the following libraries? Apologies if I have
 > simply overlooked any of them:
 >
 >
 > * Floating Point Utilities (Johan Rade)

I'm working with John Maddock on this.
I'm expecting parts of the library to make it into Boost 1.38.

John, did you get the code I sent you?

--Johan Råde

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Permalink | Reply |
headers
John Maddock | 22 Nov 17:46

Re: Review Wizard Report for November 2008

Johan Råde wrote:
> Ronald Garcia wrote:
>  >
>  > A few libraries have been reviewed and accepted into boost, but
> have
>  > not yet appeared in SVN as far as I can tell.  Could some light be
>  > shed on the status of the following libraries? Apologies if I have
>  > simply overlooked any of them:
>  >
>  >
>  > * Floating Point Utilities (Johan Rade)
>
> I'm working with John Maddock on this.
> I'm expecting parts of the library to make it into Boost 1.38.
>
> John, did you get the code I sent you?

Yep, suffering from a flakey machine and intermittent net access at present, 
will catch up eventually!

John. 

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Permalink | Reply |
headers
vicente.botet | 26 Nov 12:33

Re: Review Wizard Report for November 2008

Hi,
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ronald Garcia" <garcia <at> osl.iu.edu>
To: "boost-users" <boost-users <at> lists.boost.org>; "Boost mailing list" <boost <at> lists.boost.org>; <boost-announce <at> lists.boost.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 10:44 PM
Subject: [boost] Review Wizard Report for November 2008

> A link to this report will be posted to www.boost.org. If you would
> like us to make any modifications or additions to this report before
> we do that, please email Ron or John.

Currently, the "Past Review Results and Milestones" table lost the links to the code and docs of the
accepted library. Some times they are on the Vault, sometimes on the sandbox and other on private sites.
What do you think to preserv this information? I would also replace the review dates by the accepted date.

> If you're a library author and plan on submitting a library for review
> in the next 3-6 months, send Ron or John a short description of your
> library and we'll add it to the Libraries Under Construction below. We
> know that there are many libraries that are near completion, but we
> have hard time keeping track all of them. Please keep us informed
> about your progress.

Maybe the wiki could be more adequated. It could also contain ongoing libraries or libraries that are no
moree maintained, but that can help the Boost community.

Best,
Vicente

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
John Phillips | 26 Nov 19:57

Re: Review Wizard Report for November 2008

vicente.botet wrote:
> Hi,
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ronald Garcia" <garcia <at> osl.iu.edu>
> To: "boost-users" <boost-users <at> lists.boost.org>; "Boost mailing list" <boost <at> lists.boost.org>; <boost-announce <at> lists.boost.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 10:44 PM
> Subject: [boost] Review Wizard Report for November 2008
> 
> 
>> A link to this report will be posted to www.boost.org. If you would
>> like us to make any modifications or additions to this report before
>> we do that, please email Ron or John.
> 
> Currently, the "Past Review Results and Milestones" table lost the links to the code and docs of the
accepted library. Some times they are on the Vault, sometimes on the sandbox and other on private sites.
What do you think to preserv this information? I would also replace the review dates by the accepted date.

   In many cases, those old files are not maintained or are even removed 
after the review is done. If it becomes part of Boost, it will be in the 
trunk. If it does not, then it is entirely up to the author to decide 
whether they even want it to be accessible anymore. It is entirely 
reasonable to have the old information disappear when the review is 
done, and I think it is a good choice.

>  
>> If you're a library author and plan on submitting a library for review
>> in the next 3-6 months, send Ron or John a short description of your
>> library and we'll add it to the Libraries Under Construction below. We
>> know that there are many libraries that are near completion, but we
>> have hard time keeping track all of them. Please keep us informed
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
vicente.botet | 26 Nov 21:33

Re: Review Wizard Report for November 2008

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Phillips" <phillips <at> mps.ohio-state.edu>
To: <boost <at> lists.boost.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Review Wizard Report for November 2008

> 
> vicente.botet wrote:
>> Hi,
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Ronald Garcia" <garcia <at> osl.iu.edu>
>> To: "boost-users" <boost-users <at> lists.boost.org>; "Boost mailing list" <boost <at> lists.boost.org>; <boost-announce <at> lists.boost.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 10:44 PM
>> Subject: [boost] Review Wizard Report for November 2008
>> 
>> 
>>> A link to this report will be posted to www.boost.org. If you would
>>> like us to make any modifications or additions to this report before
>>> we do that, please email Ron or John.
>> 
>> Currently, the "Past Review Results and Milestones" table lost the links to the code and docs of the
accepted library. Some times they are on the Vault, sometimes on the sandbox and other on private sites.
What do you think to preserv this information? I would also replace the review dates by the accepted date.
> 
>   In many cases, those old files are not maintained or are even removed 
> after the review is done. If it becomes part of Boost, it will be in the 
> trunk. If it does not, then it is entirely up to the author to decide 
> whether they even want it to be accessible anymore. It is entirely 
> reasonable to have the old information disappear when the review is 
> done, and I think it is a good choice.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
John Phillips | 26 Nov 23:07

Re: Review Wizard Report for November 2008

vicente.botet wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Phillips" <phillips <at> mps.ohio-state.edu>
>>   In many cases, those old files are not maintained or are even removed 
>> after the review is done. If it becomes part of Boost, it will be in the 
>> trunk. If it does not, then it is entirely up to the author to decide 
>> whether they even want it to be accessible anymore. It is entirely 
>> reasonable to have the old information disappear when the review is 
>> done, and I think it is a good choice.
> 
> Do you find reasonable that this information is no more available to the Boost community?
> What about replacing the review dates by the accepted date?

   The only things that are no longer available are libraries that did 
not pass review and the author decided to remove, and libraries that did 
pass review where the author decided to remove out of date versions. 
Even in those cases, there may or may not have ever been a copy on boost 
servers.

   Once something has been released by boost, it is available even after 
changes have been made. So, yes I am fine with authors deciding what to 
do with their own pre-boost release libraries.

   If people really want the accepted date, I would need a clear 
definition of what that means. Is it the last day of the review, the day 
the manager tells us that it was accepted, the day it was first added to 
trunk, the date of first boost release, or some other date? What 
information is contained in that date that is more useful than the 
review dates? So far, I think it has been done this way because no one 
has seen value in changing the date later (The current method predates
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Tobias Schwinger | 27 Nov 16:23
Favicon

Re: Review Wizard Report for November 2008

Hi Ron & community,

Ronald Garcia wrote:
> ==============================================
> Review Wizard Status Report for November 2008
> ==============================================
> 

...

> A few libraries have been reviewed and accepted into boost, but have
> not yet appeared in SVN as far as I can tell.  Could some light be
> shed on the status of the following libraries? Apologies if I have
> simply overlooked any of them:
> 

...

> * Factory (Tobias Schwinger)
> * Forward (Tobias Schwinger)

OK, those have been updated (according to the review comments) and just 
been added to the SVN trunk.

Sorry for the long delay. My time for Boost activities was very limited 
during the last couple of months.

Regards,
Tobias
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Ronald Garcia | 29 Nov 03:37
Favicon

Re: Review Wizard Report for November 2008

Hi Tobias,

Thanks for the update.  I will update the review schedule to reflect  
this.

Cheers,
ron

On Nov 27, 2008, at 9:23 AM, Tobias Schwinger wrote:

> Hi Ron & community,
>
> Ronald Garcia wrote:
>> ==============================================
>> Review Wizard Status Report for November 2008
>> ==============================================
>
> ...
>
>> A few libraries have been reviewed and accepted into boost, but have
>> not yet appeared in SVN as far as I can tell.  Could some light be
>> shed on the status of the following libraries? Apologies if I have
>> simply overlooked any of them:
>
> ...
>
>> * Factory (Tobias Schwinger)
>> * Forward (Tobias Schwinger)
>
> OK, those have been updated (according to the review comments) and
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Andrew Sutton | 30 Nov 14:05

Re: Review Wizard Report for November 2008


Thanks for the update.  I will update the review schedule to reflect this.

Ron,

There's still a big addition to Boost.Graph lurking in sandbox/SOC/2007 that was supposed to go up for a mini-review in 2007, but we never got around to finalizing it. I suppose it would be a good idea to re-queue it.

Another option would be for me to simply integrate the additions as maintenance without a review. Since its mostly new code, there shouldn't be any breaking changes to the library.

Andrew Sutton
andrew.n.sutton <at> gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users <at> lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Andrey Semashev | 28 Nov 20:59

Re: Review Wizard Report for November 2008

Ronald Garcia wrote:
> A few libraries have been reviewed and accepted into boost, but have
> not yet appeared in SVN as far as I can tell.  Could some light be
> shed on the status of the following libraries? Apologies if I have
> simply overlooked any of them:
> 
> 
> * Scope Exit (Alexander Nasonov)
> 
> Any information on the whereabouts of these libraries would be greatly
> appreciated.

I've contacted with Alexander and he said he was working on the docs for
the library and also had to change the code. He is very limited in time,
but expressed hope to get it into 1.38.

> If you're a library author and plan on submitting a library for review
> in the next 3-6 months, send Ron or John a short description of your
> library and we'll add it to the Libraries Under Construction below. We
> know that there are many libraries that are near completion, but we
> have hard time keeping track all of them. Please keep us informed
> about your progress.

I am working on a logging library, online docs available here:

http://boost-log.sourceforge.net

The functionality is quite ready, the docs are at about 70% ready. There
are a few examples, but no tests yet (I'm using the examples for
testing). I hope to submit it for a review at early 2009.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Permalink | Reply |

Gmane