[Boost documentation] was Re: serialization1.36.0 extended_type_info exit issue(s)

>From the boost build / merge
>> The same goes for boost documentation which I would
>> really like to use.  But I don't feel confident that "it
>> just works"
>
> Heh, there's nobody here who would disagree with that.

To me the sad part of this is

a) that I personally have a HUGE
need for something like the boost documentation system
in my own projects.

b) I feel that if it were subjected to the
normal boost testing regimen, it would be a dependable
product by now. Or at least we would have a good test
matrix which I could use to know what aspects I can't
use in my environment.

What I would like to see is:

a) a directory structures that looks like one of the following

.../libs
    serialization
        doc
            *.html // i.e. same as we have now

or