Why not? :)

Posted at: http://interreality.org/phorum/read.php?2,286,286#msg-286
Malx wrote:

Hello!

I have seen this project a while ago and still it hard to grasp :)
Sorry if I miss the point.

Do you know the language:
http://www.iolanguage.com/
http://www.quag.geek.nz/io/getting-started/

 It is very small and easily embeddable language. It is Object oriented but very simple. It has no classes,
but only objects (same as JS). And instead of methods it has messages ( File.open() is actually "send
message 'open(param)' to object File). All things there are objects - numbers, base library, key words -
they are just ordinary objects.

 So why I mention it?

 Why not to build VOS on top of existing language implementation? :)))

 Instead of scripting bindings - you get whole language for scripting.
 Instead of recreating object environment - you just use existing one.
 Instead of hard way of creating all object in C++ you could use most of scripting language and implement base
library objects in C/C++ and embed them as IO objects.
This will help newcomers a lot - just write scripts to make content.

http://www.quag.geek.nz/io/visual/
 (could you draw something like this for VOS? ;)