gmane.comp.lib.wxwidgets.wxlua.user

operator bind

Hi John,

This first few wrap fine.

     %operator a2dDoMu& operator=( const a2dDoMu& );
     %operator a2dDoMu& operator=( const wxChar* );
     %operator a2dDoMu&   operator=( double );
     %operator int operator==( const a2dDoMu& ) const;
     %operator int operator!=( const a2dDoMu& ) const;

But this one refuses:

     %operator operator double();

The idea behind this class is to store internal numbers as "1.23 um" or "1.2 
inch" etc., and the double operator is how to get the value as a single double.

Not a great problem at the moment.
But maybe you can fix it for a next version of wxLua.

Thanks,

Klaas

--

-- 
Unclassified

Attachment (db348.vcf): text/x-vcard, 88 bytes

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Continue reading)

headers

John Labenski | 13 May 06:13

Re: operator bind

On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Klaas Holwerda
<db348@...> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
>  This first few wrap fine.
>
>     %operator a2dDoMu& operator=( const a2dDoMu& );
>     %operator a2dDoMu& operator=( const wxChar* );
>     %operator a2dDoMu&   operator=( double );
>     %operator int operator==( const a2dDoMu& ) const;
>     %operator int operator!=( const a2dDoMu& ) const;
>
>  But this one refuses:
>
>     %operator operator double();
>
>  The idea behind this class is to store internal numbers as "1.23 um" or
> "1.2 inch" etc., and the double operator is how to get the value as a single
> double.
>
>  Not a great problem at the moment.
>  But maybe you can fix it for a next version of wxLua.

Humm, I hadn't thought about adding the typecasting operators. The Lua
syntax might be a little weird for this though, "obj:op_double()",
maybe it might make more sense to add a more readable function
obj:GetAsDouble() or something.

Regards,
    John

(Continue reading)

headers

andre arpin | 15 May 22:23

Re: operator bind

Hi John,

> Humm, I hadn't thought about adding the typecasting operators. The Lua
> syntax might be a little weird for this though, "obj:op_double()",
> maybe it might make more sense to add a more readable function
> obj:GetAsDouble() or something.
> 

Note that if you choose GetAsDouble then 
obj.AsDouble should be available for consistencies.

Andre

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/