Hello,
I just changed my code to incorporate log4net.Core.ILogger
instead of the comfort class log4net.ILog.
With the Logger Wrapper Type always entered at the call of the log method,
it now works. using only the ILog interface shows broken (as explained)
behavior. I may be wrong, but this isn't supposed to happen this way, is
it?
| Andreas HOELZLWIMMER <andreas.hoelzlwimmer <at> racon.at>
04.06.2012 09:13
|
Bitte antworten an
"Log4NET User" <log4net-user <at> logging.apache.org>
|
|
|
An
|
"Log4NET User" <log4net-user <at> logging.apache.org>
|
|
Kopie
|
|
|
Thema
|
Antwort: Re: ILog Wrapping |
|
The way I'm doing it now is by calling this
line:
private
static
readonly
log4net.ILog
log =
log4net.LogManager.GetLogger(System.Reflection.MethodBase.GetCurrentMethod().DeclaringType);
From what I see in your example, the important thing is to give the logger
your current logging method Type, which is what I do. The difference is
that instead of using the ILogger interface I use the ILog Interface, mostly
because I wanted to use LogDebug, LogInfo, ... for comfort. Doing it with
the given line, I expect it to work similarily to the example, namely
private readonly
static
Type
declaringType = typeof(Log4NetLogger);
_logger.Log(declaringType, log4net.Core.Level.Info, message, e);
Am I wrong to expect it to work in the same way?
| Ron Grabowski <rongrabowski <at> yahoo.com>
03.06.2012 01:11
|
Bitte antworten an
"Log4NET User" <log4net-user <at> logging.apache.org>
|
|
|
An
|
Log4NET User <log4net-user <at> logging.apache.org>
|
|
Kopie
|
|
|
Thema
|
Re: ILog Wrapping |
|
The original poster specifically mentioned he did not want to have to walk
to the call stack. Log4net internally walks the call stack so there's no
need to walk it twice.
The Stack Overflow article is correct. Here's another example:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ibatis/cs/ibatisnet-1/trunk/src/IBatisNet.Common.Logging.Log4Net/
The key concept is needing to pass in the Type of your wrapper to the actually
log method so log4net knows to skip over that stack frame when its processing
call information.
From: Martin Milan <Martin.Milan <at> enservegroup.com>
To: Log4NET User <log4net-user <at> logging.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, June 1, 2012 4:13 AM
Subject: RE: ILog Wrapping
Can you not walk the call stack until you come across a method that is
not from the same namespace as your wrapper?
Just an idea…
From: Andreas HOELZLWIMMER [
mailto:andreas.hoelzlwimmer <at> racon.at]
Sent: 01 June 2012 08:36
To: log4net-user <at> logging.apache.org
Subject: ILog Wrapping
Hi,
I need to switch our logger to Log4Net in our application. I need to implement
our personal logging interface, which means I need to wrap the Logger.
The logger requires to display method name and namespace. With the "usual"
way it always shows the method and namespace of the wrapper, not the method
called. The option found on stackoverflow (
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/157232/how-to-log-methodname-when-wrapping-log4net)
does not help and I wanted to know if there is a way to log the correct
method/namespace without having to go back in the call stack. Is there
a best practise for wrapping ILog?
best regards,
Andreas
Der Austausch von Nachrichten mit o.a. Absender via e-mail dient ausschließlich
Informationszwecken. Rechtsgeschäftliche Erklärungen dürfen über dieses
Medium nicht ausgetauscht werden.
Correspondence with a.m. sender via e-mail is only for information purposes.
This medium is not to be used for the exchange of legally-binding communications.
EnServe Group Limited ("EnServe"), registered in England and
Wales with registration number 3250709.EnServe's registered office is at
Hertsmere House, Shenley Road, Borehamwood, Herts, WD6 1TE, United Kingdom
and a list of EnServe's subsidiaries and their registered particulars is
available for inspection at this location. This email and any attachments
to it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual
to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those
of the author and do not necessarily represent those of EnServe or its
subsidiaries. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you
must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received
this email in error.
This message has been scanned by Symantec Mail Security
Der Austausch von Nachrichten mit o.a. Absender via e-mail dient ausschließlich
Informationszwecken. Rechtsgeschäftliche Erklärungen dürfen über dieses
Medium nicht ausgetauscht werden.
Correspondence with a.m. sender via e-mail is only for information purposes.
This medium is not to be used for the exchange of legally-binding communications.
Der Austausch von Nachrichten mit o.a. Absender via e-mail dient ausschließlich Informationszwecken. Rechtsgeschäftliche Erklärungen dürfen über dieses Medium nicht ausgetauscht werden.Correspondence with a.m. sender via e-mail is only for information purposes. This medium is not to be used for the exchange of legally-binding communications.