4 Jan 2012 22:13
RE: SOT - Switch port reconfig - Safe "on the fly"?
joea <at> j4computers.com <joea <at> j4computers.com>
2012-01-04 21:13:43 GMT
2012-01-04 21:13:43 GMT
Update - went without a hitch. joe a. >>> "joea <at> j4computers.com" 11/20/11 5:44 PM >>> No reason, I guess. Never really considered it. Thanks for mentioning it. I can see that it would be useful where there are more than two nodes and resources are "balanced" between nodes. In some shops, tho, a cluster leave on an unused node, in a two node cluster, would be fine too. But, then again, maintenance mode may be less time consuming. I'll have to play with it. joe a. >>> On 11/20/2011 at 11:56 AM, Tom Anstey wrote: > joe a., is there a problem with the "cluster maintenance on" command? > > In other words, are you for some reason unable to put the cluster into > maintenance mode? This is exactly what it is designed for. > > T > > ________________________________________ > From: novell-bounces <at> netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk > [novell-bounces <at> netlab1.oucs.ox.ac.uk] On Behalf Of joea <at> j4computers.com > [joea <at> j4computers.com] > Sent: 20 November 2011 13:14 > To: Novell LAN Interest Group Subject: Re: SOT - Switch port reconfig - Safe "on the fly"? > > Searching for "link integrity bursts" provides a lot to read and consider.(Continue reading)
RSS Feed