28 Sep 23:36
Re: status of performance regressions on mozilla-central
From: Karl Tomlinson <moznews <at> karlt.net>
Subject: Re: status of performance regressions on mozilla-central
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.seamonkey
Date: 2008-09-28 21:36:51 GMT
Subject: Re: status of performance regressions on mozilla-central
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.mozilla.devel.seamonkey
Date: 2008-09-28 21:36:51 GMT
L. David Baron writes: > * sdwilsh's backout of 456910 and the sqlite changes fixed the > performance regression on Mac OS X 10.4 and 10.5 in the one build > generated right after he landed the backout, and then in the next > cycle (which only added a trivial reftest.list change), the > performance numbers were *even better*, more than erasing the > increases from yesterday. > > * on Windows XP, the builds following the landing of the places > fsync work got us back the 20ms that we lost yesterday, but when > that was backed out the needle didn't move. Then when sdwilsh > backed out the sqlite upgrade and 456910, we got 20ms back again, > so again, we're a good bit ahead of where we were yesterday > morning. In other words, we're also ahead of where we started > yesterday morning, but the steps happened at different times. Being "even better" and "a good bit ahead" I think are due to changes in the testing infrastructure: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457582 (I haven't looked into Vista/Txul, but I suspect that is another issue.)
RSS Feed