-----Original Message-----
From: Hieu Hoang [mailto:h.hoang-Y3tGgqFSo3OFxr2TtlUqVg@public.gmane.org]
Sent: 04 October 2007 21:58
To: 'Jie Wu'; 'moses-support-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org'
Subject: RE: [Moses-support] GCC and VC compilation

hi jie,

 

moses on vs.net doesn't support srilm, which is highly optimised. it uses an internal language model, which is not.

 

also, it uses more memory than the cygwin version, for you may experience disk thrashing. debug mode uses even more, and is even more slow.

 

Hieu Hoang

www.hoang.co.uk/hieu

-----Original Message-----
From: moses-support-bounces-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org [mailto:moses-support-bounces-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Jie Wu
Sent: 04 October 2007 21:47
To: moses-support-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [Moses-support] GCC and VC compilation

Oh, I am sorry, I had a typo in the very important form. Following is the form again:

	Binary size	Translation time for a single sentence 'das ist ein kleine haus' using the Tutorial data from the website
Moses-gcc	21,158K	8sec
Moses-vc-debug	2,796K	30min
Moses-vc-release	508KB	25sec

 

On 10/4/07, Jie Wu <jie82.wu-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:

Hi,

I subversioned Moses from the repository and compiled it both using gcc under cygwin and vc compiler under VS 2005. In either case, I don't have problems generating the binaries. However, I do find tremendous differences between the two binaries.

	Binary size	Translation time for a single sentence 'das ist ein kleine haus' using the Tutorial data from the website
Moses-gcc	21,158K	8sec
Moses-vc-debug	2,796K	30min
Moses-vc-release	508KB	30min

 

Personally I really don't think that's a compiler problem. They shouldn't incur any significant difference. Is there something I am missing? Can anybody shed some light on this?

Thanks
Jie


--
=================================
Jie Wu
Homepage:
http://www.jiewu.info

--
=================================
Jie Wu
Homepage:
http://www.jiewu.info