Your chance to influence how agile is defined in an upcoming IEEE-standard

I am going to the finnish Lapland (right where Santa Claues lives) on 
Sunday November 30 for 72 hours of intense discussions about what 
Agile is.
Participants are invited internationally from industry and academia 

However, I feel that the participants could use additional input.
Earlier work on this standard has spent some time on interpretations 
of things like "How much documentation" and even to some degree what 
the manifesto really means.

I feel that we need to define Agile by what it is useful for.
A definition of what good Agile does might last longer than a 
detailed description of current practices in the evolving art of 
Agile.

Who wants a standard for what Agile is? 
Well, people who have to comply with e g safety-critical requirements 
from hard-nosed government bodies will appreciate support from an 
actual rationale for going from waterfall(ish) development to Agile.
And just being convinced that agile helps does not impress on 
auditors. A standard that defines agile in a way that makes sense 
will help these folks tremendously.

Please use the survey to express your view on what Agile is useful 
for and what makes you think that someone is Agile. Email with 
additional comments is of course also welcome.

The short "What makes you agile?" survey is at: 
http://www.polldaddy.com/s/6DF01D606D905EBB/