headers
Robert Bradshaw | 7 Nov 00:01
Favicon

Re: Fwd: while using Cython I got this... any ideas ?

On Nov 6, 2007, at 2:57 PM, Ulisses Furquim wrote:

> This error happens when Cython couldn't generate the C source code
> file. Can you please update to Cython 0.9.6.8 and try to compile
> python-efl again? Yesterday I've just changed everything there to work
> with this newer version. If you have any problems, please tell me and
> I'll help you.

Just out of curiosity, what did you have to change to get things to  
work?

- Robert
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Ulisses Furquim | 7 Nov 00:09

Re: Fwd: while using Cython I got this... any ideas ?

On 11/6/07, Robert Bradshaw <robertwb@...> wrote:
> On Nov 6, 2007, at 2:57 PM, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
>
> > This error happens when Cython couldn't generate the C source code
> > file. Can you please update to Cython 0.9.6.8 and try to compile
> > python-efl again? Yesterday I've just changed everything there to work
> > with this newer version. If you have any problems, please tell me and
> > I'll help you.
>
> Just out of curiosity, what did you have to change to get things to
> work?

We're using 0.9.6.7 and I had to replace "with GIL" with "with gil"
and the include dirs passed with -I to setuptools didn't work anymore.
I had to update pyrex_include_dirs directly. And that reminded me of
asking if you guys plan to replace all occurences of "pyrex" with
"cython". Do you?

Regards,

-- Ulisses
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Robert Bradshaw | 7 Nov 00:11
Favicon

Re: Fwd: while using Cython I got this... any ideas ?

On Nov 6, 2007, at 3:09 PM, Ulisses Furquim wrote:

> On 11/6/07, Robert Bradshaw <robertwb@...> wrote:
>> On Nov 6, 2007, at 2:57 PM, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
>>
>>> This error happens when Cython couldn't generate the C source code
>>> file. Can you please update to Cython 0.9.6.8 and try to compile
>>> python-efl again? Yesterday I've just changed everything there to  
>>> work
>>> with this newer version. If you have any problems, please tell me  
>>> and
>>> I'll help you.
>>
>> Just out of curiosity, what did you have to change to get things to
>> work?
>
> We're using 0.9.6.7 and I had to replace "with GIL" with "with gil"

OK

> and the include dirs passed with -I to setuptools didn't work anymore.
> I had to update pyrex_include_dirs directly.

I'll look into this

> And that reminded me of
> asking if you guys plan to replace all occurences of "pyrex" with
> "cython". Do you?

Yes, other than in the acknowledgments of course :).
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Ulisses Furquim | 7 Nov 00:13

Re: Fwd: while using Cython I got this... any ideas ?

On 11/6/07, Robert Bradshaw <robertwb@...> wrote:
> > and the include dirs passed with -I to setuptools didn't work anymore.
> > I had to update pyrex_include_dirs directly.
>
> I'll look into this

Thanks. :-)

> > And that reminded me of
> > asking if you guys plan to replace all occurences of "pyrex" with
> > "cython". Do you?
>
> Yes, other than in the acknowledgments of course :).

Ok, makes sense. I thought of asking that because of pyrex_plus,
pyrex_include_dirs and so on.

-- Ulisses
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Robert Bradshaw | 7 Nov 00:16
Favicon

Re: Fwd: while using Cython I got this... any ideas ?

On Nov 6, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Ulisses Furquim wrote:

>>> And that reminded me of
>>> asking if you guys plan to replace all occurences of "pyrex" with
>>> "cython". Do you?
>>
>> Yes, other than in the acknowledgments of course :).
>
> Ok, makes sense. I thought of asking that because of pyrex_plus,
> pyrex_include_dirs and so on.

Hmm... I hadn't thought of that... I would like to maintain  
compatibility at some level with Pyrex for configuration options and  
the likes. Probably want to accept both "cython_include_dirs" and  
"pyrex_include_dirs."

Does anyone else have any comments to make on this?

- Robert
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Ulisses Furquim | 7 Nov 00:22

Re: Fwd: while using Cython I got this... any ideas ?

On 11/6/07, Robert Bradshaw <robertwb@...> wrote:
> On Nov 6, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Ulisses Furquim wrote:
>
> >>> And that reminded me of
> >>> asking if you guys plan to replace all occurences of "pyrex" with
> >>> "cython". Do you?
> >>
> >> Yes, other than in the acknowledgments of course :).
> >
> > Ok, makes sense. I thought of asking that because of pyrex_plus,
> > pyrex_include_dirs and so on.
>
> Hmm... I hadn't thought of that... I would like to maintain
> compatibility at some level with Pyrex for configuration options and
> the likes. Probably want to accept both "cython_include_dirs" and
> "pyrex_include_dirs."
> Does anyone else have any comments to make on this?

Do we really want to accept both? If somebody wants to use Cython he
should make all the necessary changes, I think.

-- Ulisses
Permalink | Reply |

Gmane