2 Nov 2008 00:51
Re: [Cython] Cython 0.9.8.2 beta
This simple case causes the parser to fail:
cdef int doublePointer(double* inOutArray):
return 1
See: http://trac.cython.org/cython_trac/ticket/107
4 Nov 2008 06:18
Re: [Cython] Cython 0.9.8.2 beta
On Nov 1, 2008, at 4:51 PM, Jim Kleckner wrote: > This simple case causes the parser to fail: > > cdef int doublePointer(double* inOutArray): > return 1 > > > See: http://trac.cython.org/cython_trac/ticket/107 I've been unable to reproduce this with my copy, either with the beta release or the current cython-devel. Has anyone else seen this? Or perhaps there's more context that one needs to reproduce this error. - Robert
2 Nov 2008 01:44
Re: [Cython] Cython 0.9.8.2 beta
Thanks for your reports. On Nov 1, 2008, at 3:56 PM, Jim Kleckner wrote: > I gave it a try with Python 2.6 on Windows. > > 8 regression tests fail on Python 2.6 release using Visual Studio > 9.0 on > Windows XP. > > This was run using the changeset 1291:16fc9454a2e5 > > The output is stored here: > http://trac.cython.org/cython_trac/ticket/106 I don't have access to a windows build platform, but it seems that these errors are for "fake" extern definitions to test that correct code is generated. I wonder why windows complains but other platforms don't... Not sure the best way to proceed here, any Windows experts out there? Do we have to make a .h file that actually defines all the filler stuff? > On Nov 1, 2008, at 4:51 PM, Jim Kleckner wrote: > > This simple case causes the parser to fail: > > cdef int doublePointer(double* inOutArray): > return 1 This is bad, surprised we haven't run into it before. This should certainly be fixed before release.(Continue reading)
4 Nov 2008 17:10
Re: [Cython] Cython 0.9.8.2 beta
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> Thanks for your reports.
...
>> On Nov 1, 2008, at 4:51 PM, Jim Kleckner wrote:
>>
>> This simple case causes the parser to fail:
>>
>> cdef int doublePointer(double* inOutArray):
>> return 1
>
> This is bad, surprised we haven't run into it before. This should
> certainly be fixed before release.
In reducing the example, I guess I reduced it too far.
I coulda sworn I ran that specific file!
Try this, which is bad code but shouldn't cause an exception.
And has nothing to do with platforms.
cdef int foo((double*)inOutArray,):
cdef int i
i = <int> inOutArray
return i
Separately, gmane seems to be broken and isn't getting the list feed.
I've reported the problem to gmane.discuss. I hope this gets through...
5 Nov 2008 01:55
Re: [Cython] Cython 0.9.8.2 beta
Jim Kleckner wrote: > cdef int foo((double*)inOutArray,): By the way, the fact that Pyrex accepts this form of parameter declaration is probably an accident -- you can't write that in C, and I wouldn't blame Cython if it refused to support it either. -- -- Greg
5 Nov 2008 03:46
Re: [Cython] Cython 0.9.8.2 beta
On Nov 4, 2008, at 4:55 PM, Greg Ewing wrote: > Jim Kleckner wrote: > >> cdef int foo((double*)inOutArray,): > > By the way, the fact that Pyrex accepts this form of > parameter declaration is probably an accident -- you > can't write that in C, and I wouldn't blame Cython > if it refused to support it either. Unfortunately, it made the compiler crash, which is worse than flagging a syntax error. I've fixed it now. - Robert
7 Nov 2008 02:07
[Cython] Cython 0.10 release candidate
Given the number of new features, I'm thinking it's time to bump a more major version number. (Probably should have done so last version, but got to start sometime.) Try the package up at http://cython.org/Cython-0.10.rc.tar.gz . Unless there are major issues, let's release. - Robert
7 Nov 2008 19:58
Re: [Cython] Cython 0.10 release candidate
Hi, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > Given the number of new features, I'm thinking it's time to bump a > more major version number. (Probably should have done so last > version, but got to start sometime.) > > Try the package up at http://cython.org/Cython-0.10.rc.tar.gz . Good call. I think it makes sense to go away from the 0.9-so-close-to-1.0 scheme. I was always thinking of Linux 1.0 the closer we got... It's fine with me if 1.0 follows 0.12 or whatever. > Unless there are major issues, let's release. Yay, go Cython 0.X! :) Stefan
RSS Feed