headers
Neal Norwitz | 6 Oct 19:55

status of 2.5

Should we plan to put out a final 2.5 release?  If so, should we
continue to backport fixes (like Martin's removal of Alpha in
setup.py)?  My preference is that we do put out a final 2.5 that has
all accumulated bug fixes.  Then close the branch.  That way if we put
out a security release for 2.5, it will be clean and easy.

n
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev <at> python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-python-dev%40m.gmane.org
Permalink | Reply |
headers
skip | 6 Oct 21:28
Favicon

Re: status of 2.5


    Neal> Should we plan to put out a final 2.5 release?

I'm probably a bad person to ask.  At work we are still using 2.4. :-/

Skip
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev <at> python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-python-dev%40m.gmane.org
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Raymond Hettinger | 6 Oct 21:53
Favicon

Re: status of 2.5

[Neal Norwitz]
> Should we plan to put out a final 2.5 release?  If so, should we
> continue to backport fixes (like Martin's removal of Alpha in
> setup.py)?  My preference is that we do put out a final 2.5 that has
> all accumulated bug fixes.  Then close the branch.  That way if we put
> out a security release for 2.5, it will be clean and easy.

The 2.6/3.0 development process was so disruptive that I doubt
that 2.5 received adequate attention for bug fixes.  Why not wait
two or three months for the dust to settle?

Raymond
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev <at> python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-python-dev%40m.gmane.org
Permalink | Reply |
headers
"Martin v. =?iso-8859-1?q?L=F6wis=22?= | 6 Oct 22:38

Re: status of 2.5

> The 2.6/3.0 development process was so disruptive that I doubt
> that 2.5 received adequate attention for bug fixes.  Why not wait
> two or three months for the dust to settle?

Would it receive more attention in the next three months? Who
specifically would give it that attention?

Regards,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev <at> python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-python-dev%40m.gmane.org
Permalink | Reply |
headers
A.M. Kuchling | 6 Oct 23:28
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: status of 2.5

On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 12:53:01PM -0700, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> The 2.6/3.0 development process was so disruptive that I doubt
> that 2.5 received adequate attention for bug fixes.  Why not wait
> two or three months for the dust to settle?

Can you please clarify your meaning? Do you mean that 

* we haven't been backporting fixes to 2.5?
* we should wait to see if any horrible problems are reported in 2.6?
* we need to look at the logs for commits that should be applied to 2.5?

--amk
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev <at> python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-python-dev%40m.gmane.org
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Raymond Hettinger | 7 Oct 01:50
Favicon

Re: status of 2.5

[A.M. Kuchling]
> Can you please clarify your meaning? Do you mean that 
> 
> * we haven't been backporting fixes to 2.5?

Unsure.  I surely have given zero attention to 2.5.

> * we should wait to see if any horrible problems are reported in 2.6?

Yes.  That would be a great idea.

> * we need to look at the logs for commits that should be applied to 2.5?

Yes.  That would be a great idea too.

ISTM, that 3.0 and 2.6 backports have consumed substantial developer attention over the last few months.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev <at> python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-python-dev%40m.gmane.org
Permalink | Reply |
headers
"Martin v. =?iso-8859-1?q?L=F6wis=22?= | 7 Oct 09:16

Re: status of 2.5

> ISTM, that 3.0 and 2.6 backports have consumed substantial developer
> attention over the last few months.

Sure - but who is going to sit down and study the commit logs, to do
backporting? Unless someone specifically volunteers to do that (with
a specific timeline when he will start, and when he will complete),
I see little chance that that any additional backporting will happen.

I will send an announcement asking people to propose missing backports.

Regards,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev <at> python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-python-dev%40m.gmane.org
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Antoine Pitrou | 7 Oct 13:31

Re: status of 2.5

Raymond Hettinger <python <at> rcn.com> writes:
> 
> The 2.6/3.0 development process was so disruptive that I doubt
> that 2.5 received adequate attention for bug fixes.  Why not wait
> two or three months for the dust to settle?

I know that I, and a couple of others, have tried to backport "important" bug
fixes (by that I mean security fixes, crashers, memory leaks, as well as glaring
behaviour problems) to 2.5 when there was no risk to reduce stability or
compatibility.

It's also true that 2.6/3.0 were so disruptive that the reason why few things
were backported is simply that few things could be backported at all. Most
checkins were related to new functionality or modified behaviour, or new bugs
introduced by either of those.

Everyone can look at
http://code.python.org/hg/branches/release2.5-maint/shortlog to get an idea of
where 2.5 is. 2.5.2 was tagged ~7 months ago.

Regards

Antoine.

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev <at> python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-python-dev%40m.gmane.org
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
"Martin v. =?iso-8859-1?q?L=F6wis=22?= | 6 Oct 21:54

Re: status of 2.5

Neal Norwitz wrote:
> Should we plan to put out a final 2.5 release?  If so, should we
> continue to backport fixes (like Martin's removal of Alpha in
> setup.py)?  My preference is that we do put out a final 2.5 that has
> all accumulated bug fixes.  Then close the branch.  That way if we put
> out a security release for 2.5, it will be clean and easy.

That is my plan also. I would like to release 2.5.2 two weeks after
Python 3.0, or on November 1st, whatever happens later (and it seems
that Python-3-plus-two-weeks happens later).

So one week after Python 3, there would be a release candidate, and
two weeks, the final release.

Simultaneously, I would also release 2.4.6.

If people think 2.5.2 should be released earlier than that, please
let me know.

Regards,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev <at> python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-python-dev%40m.gmane.org
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Terry Reedy | 7 Oct 02:41

Re: status of 2.5

Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Neal Norwitz wrote:
>> Should we plan to put out a final 2.5 release?  If so, should we
>> continue to backport fixes (like Martin's removal of Alpha in
>> setup.py)?  My preference is that we do put out a final 2.5 that has
>> all accumulated bug fixes.  Then close the branch.  That way if we put
>> out a security release for 2.5, it will be clean and easy.

> That is my plan also. I would like to release 2.5.2 two weeks after
> Python 3.0, or on November 1st, whatever happens later (and it seems
> that Python-3-plus-two-weeks happens later).

You of course meant 2.5.3.

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev <at> python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-python-dev%40m.gmane.org
Permalink | Reply |

Gmane