Re: [M2] New source names?

Gael Varoquaux wrote:
>>> GlyphFactory is seems a little too vague.  SurfaceFactory seems a little
>>> too generic.  Or SimpleSurface/SimpleGlyph or ShapeFactory?  This is a
>>> pain.
> 
>> Technically, I like GlyphFactory and maybe SurfaceFactory.  Thinking about a 
>> MayaVi user's POV, I would suggest something like "Built-in Surfaces" and 
>> "Built-in Images"; maybe that (mangled) could lead to class names as well.
> 
> Yeah, "BuiltInImage" and "BuiltInSurface" seems nice (no plural, to be
> consistent with "ParametricSurface".

I'm going for BuiltinImage and BuiltinSurface (Python's builtin is 
called __builtin__ and not __built_in__) then and will commit this shortly.

Thanks for the feedback.

cheers,
prabhu