paths output from search algorithms?
2012-03-02 08:02:32 GMT
Hi,
_______________________________________________ graph-tool mailing list graph-tool <at> skewed.de http://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool
Hi,
_______________________________________________ graph-tool mailing list graph-tool <at> skewed.de http://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool
On 03/02/2012 09:02 AM, Matthias Ekman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a way to get the actual paths itself - instead of the
> distance - from the search algorithms like e.g. dijkstra_search?
You can use the shortest_path() function.
http://projects.skewed.de/graph-tool/doc/topology.html#graph_tool.topology.shortest_path
Otherwise you can write your own search visitor which records the path
for you.
> As a related question, in a weighted adjacency matrix, how are the
> weights interpreted for dijkstra and centrality functions (pagerank,
> betweenness centrality) that rely on it. Is it low weight = easier to
> "travel", or is it the other way around?
The weights are always _minimized_, unless otherwise stated. Note that
in Pagerank the weights are used differently, since there is no shortest
path computation in this case (see its documentation for more details).
Cheers,
Tiago
--
--
Tiago de Paula Peixoto <tiago <at> skewed.de>
_______________________________________________ graph-tool mailing list graph-tool <at> skewed.de http://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool
Thank you Tiago!
On Friday, March 2, 2012 9:20:27 AM UTC+1, Tiago de Paula Peixoto wrote:
On 03/02/2012 09:02 AM, Matthias Ekman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a way to get the actual paths itself - instead of the
> distance - from the search algorithms like e.g. dijkstra_search?You can use the shortest_path() function.
http://projects.skewed.de/graph-tool/doc/topology.html#graph_tool.topology.shortest_path
Otherwise you can write your own search visitor which records the path
for you.> As a related question, in a weighted adjacency matrix, how are the
> weights interpreted for dijkstra and centrality functions (pagerank,
> betweenness centrality) that rely on it. Is it low weight = easier to
> "travel", or is it the other way around?The weights are always _minimized_, unless otherwise stated. Note that
in Pagerank the weights are used differently, since there is no shortest
path computation in this case (see its documentation for more details).Cheers,
Tiago--
Tiago de Paula Peixoto <tiago <at> skewed.de>_______________________________________________
graph-tool mailing list
graph-tool <at> skewed.de
http://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool
_______________________________________________ graph-tool mailing list graph-tool <at> skewed.de http://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool
RSS Feed