7 Nov 2005 21:59
Re: welcome to Arusha!
Will Partain <partain <at> dcs.gla.ac.uk>
2005-11-07 20:59:50 GMT
2005-11-07 20:59:50 GMT
Hi, Jim (and others) -- Arusha land is pretty quiet, but still here... On your various remarks: > 1.) A sidai suggestion: sidai/package/rsync.xml has a phrase in the > <patch> section that names a bunch of rsync versions. I think the > sense of the test should be reversed, so it tests *for* [ > "$PKG_VERSION" = "2.5.5" ] and defaults to : ok # no worries, mate. > (The "doesn't need a patch" list is already out of date, 2.6.6 is out > and the build fails because of this...) *Yes*. There are many instances of equally egregious code. Reason: the shortest path to success is to add '-o <new-version>' and move on. But, this being "collaborative sysadmin", I guess I'll need to do better(Continue reading)> 2.) Mostly a statement: the 'how do I migrate from the "try-ark" mode > to a real site' instructions are .... lacking. I got a bit frustrated > trying to discover in which dark corner the magic config file that was > causing certain behavior lived... turned out I had a mixture of old > and new happening, and didn't know that, because of the level of magic > involved. At that early phase of maturity, this needs to be smoother. > (I know -- send patches... :) Urgh. I _do_ tend to test that stuff before releases (which are now about a year apart -- CVS updates happen, of course...), but of course I never see it with newbie eyes. All advice welcome... > 3.) Newbie Q: what happens if a machine is down when a deploy/reveal > command is issued? Is there anything akin to "self-healing state > management" in here?
> 2.) Mostly a statement: the 'how do I migrate from the "try-ark" mode
> to a real site' instructions are .... lacking. I got a bit frustrated
> trying to discover in which dark corner the magic config file that was
> causing certain behavior lived... turned out I had a mixture of old
> and new happening, and didn't know that, because of the level of magic
> involved. At that early phase of maturity, this needs to be smoother.
> (I know -- send patches... :)
Urgh. I _do_ tend to test that stuff before releases (which are now
about a year apart -- CVS updates happen, of course...), but of course
I never see it with newbie eyes. All advice welcome...
> 3.) Newbie Q: what happens if a machine is down when a deploy/reveal
> command is issued? Is there anything akin to "self-healing state
> management" in here?
RSS Feed