Re: Is -j broken, or is it just me?

Thanks for the patch Chunk - I got it this time (yay).

I tried coding up the version I described, and here's that patch -
thoughts anyone?
It essentially does this:
   If I depend on X, then I also depend on X's co-dependents.

These dependencies would be hard to specify generically in the Jamfile
itself since you can't really say "who are my children," but in the
source it's easy.

I built some test cases to exercise Craig's issues (1) and (2), and
they both pass after applying this, but I don't really have any large
projects that use multi-output actions.
Feedback welcome.

(note: I attached the patch as a file, too. Gmail likes to force-wrap things)

diff a/make.c b/make.c
--- a/make.c
+++ b/make.c
 <at>  <at>  -169,7 +169,8  <at>  <at> 
 	COUNTS  *counts,        /* for reporting */
 	int     anyhow )        /* forcibly touch all (real) targets */
 {
-	TARGETS *c, *incs;
+	TARGETS *c, *extras, *acttarg;
+	ACTIONS *act;
 	TARGET  *ptime = t;
 	time_t  last, leaf, hlast;